Literature DB >> 13680275

Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail.

F Fogagnolo1, M Kfuri, C A J Paccola.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The advantages of intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures over dynamic screw-plate devices in the clinical setting are still a matter of debate. We performed a case series study in a teaching hospital to analyse the results of the recent AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1998 and May 2001, 46 consecutive patients (47 fractures) were included in the investigation. The average patient age was 76.4 years (range 50-93 years), and most fractures (74.5%) were unstable. Operative details, adequacy of fracture reduction, screw position in the femoral head, re-operations, and postoperative complications were documented. Functional results were evaluated by the Parker and Palmer mobility score and Barthel Index for patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 months.
RESULTS: Intraoperative technical or mechanical complications occurred in 11 patients (23.4%), mostly problems with the distal nail locking and fracture of the lateral wall of the greater trochanter. Mean surgical time was 83.4 min. The lateral protrusion of screws causing thigh pain was the most common postoperative complication, with an incidence of 21.2%. There was only one femoral shaft fracture at the nail tip caused by a fall at 9 months of follow-up. Five patients (10.6%) had intra-articular migration of screws, which was associated with loss of reduction and varus collapse in one case. There were 2 persistent deep infections and 2 haematomas that required surgical drainage. The re-operation rate was 19.1%, mainly cephalic screw removal due to lateral protrusion at the proximal thigh. Ten patients (32.2%) fully recovered their Parker and Palmer mobility score, and 20 patients (66.6%) recovered more than 90% of their pre-injury Barthel Index values. The average limb shortening was 14 mm. Mortality rate during the observation period was 20.4%.
CONCLUSION: In view of only one loss of reduction with varus collapse clearly caused by a technical error, we concluded that the PFN is a suitable implant for unstable fractures, but the high re-operation rate precludes its routine use for every pertrochanteric fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13680275     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-003-0586-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  52 in total

1.  Management of unstable pertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plates and affect of neck-shaft angle on functional outcomes.

Authors:  Emrah Kovalak; Cenk Ermutlu; Tolga Atay; Özgür Başal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-07-15

Review 2.  [Pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  G H Sandmann; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comparison of two implant designs.

Authors:  Nicolas E Efstathopoulos; Vassilios S Nikolaou; John T Lazarettos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Complications after pertrochanteric fractures].

Authors:  B Füchtmeier; F Gebhard; A Lenich
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  A simple reproducible technique for the retrieval of broken proximal femoral blades, a technical note and review of literature.

Authors:  Mohamed A Imam; Ziad Harb; David Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-13

6.  Loss of offset after pertrochanteric hip fractures affects hip function one year after surgery with a short intramedullary nail. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Max Gordon; Per-Olov Berntsson; Erik Sjölund; Yilmaz Demir; Carl Johan Hedbeck; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  [Trochanteric femoral fractures: anatomy, biomechanics and choice of implants].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; T Lein; P Bula
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Hip screw lateral migration with no cut-out or non-union implication: a case report.

Authors:  Nikolaos Lasanianos; Georgios Mouzopoulos; Ioannis Georgilas
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-03-10

9.  Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation - Is Proximal Femoral Locked Compression Plate Better Than Dynamic Hip Screw.

Authors:  Naiyer Asif; Sohail Ahmad; Owais Ahmad Qureshi; Latif Zafar Jilani; Tajdar Hamesh; Tariq Jameel
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

10.  The effect on outcomes of the application of circumferential cerclage cable following intramedullary nailing in reverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Authors:  Ahmet Imerci; Nevres Hurriyet Aydogan; Kursad Tosun
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.