Literature DB >> 30523463

The effect on outcomes of the application of circumferential cerclage cable following intramedullary nailing in reverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Ahmet Imerci1,2, Nevres Hurriyet Aydogan3, Kursad Tosun4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on union results of the application of cerclage cable around the lateral femoral wall (LFW) in postoperative fracture displacement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was made of all the cases of reverse intertrochanteric fractures over a 7-year period in a trauma center. The study included 69 fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. The age of the patients, postoperative reduction quality and complications such as mechanical failure and non-union (1.4%) were obtained from the medical records. Changes in the neck-shaft angle, the amount of LFW displacement and telescoping of proximal femoral nail antirotation blades and lag screws were measured on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. The functional evaluation of the Harris Hip Score was recorded at the final follow-up examination.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 56.31 years (range 18-93 years). Closed reduction was applied in 37 (53.7%) cases, open reduction in 10 (14.5%) and with cerclage cable in 22 (31.8%). Mechanical failure developed in 8 (11.5%) cases where cerclage cable was not used. In 2 of these 8 cases, open reduction was successful. In the patients where cerclage cable was applied, no mechanical failure developed and no case underwent revision surgery. In the cases where cerclage cable was not used, a significantly higher rate of telescoping was found. (p = 0.001). The application of cerclage cable was seen to significantly reduce the amount of LFW displacement (2.23 mm vs 8.86 mm) and shorten the time to partial weight bearing (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: In reverse intertrochanteric fractures, the application of circumferential cerclage cable with cephalomedullary nailing contributes to primary stability and accelerates mobilization. Therefore, it can be considered a good option. It reduces the risk of failure internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cable; Intertrochanteric fracture; Intramedullary nailing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30523463     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2356-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  37 in total

1.  Second-generation cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Seppo E Honkonen; Kimmo Vihtonen; Markku J Järvinen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  M CLEVELAND; D M BOSWORTH; F R THOMPSON; H J WILSON; T ISHIZUKA
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Christophe Sadowski; Anne Lübbeke; Marc Saudan; Nicolas Riand; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  One and two femoral neck screws with intramedullary nails for unstable trochanteric fractures of femur in the elderly--randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  S Vidyadhara; Sharath K Rao
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur.

Authors:  G J Haidukewych; T A Israel; D J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation.

Authors:  Henrik Palm; Steffen Jacobsen; Stig Sonne-Holm; Peter Gebuhr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail.

Authors:  Woo-Kie Min; Shin-Yoon Kim; Tae-Kong Kim; Kyu-Bong Lee; Myung-Rae Cho; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-11

8.  The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture.

Authors:  G Al-yassari; R J Langstaff; J W M Jones; M Al-Lami
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  F Fogagnolo; M Kfuri; C A J Paccola
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail.

Authors:  Si Yong Park; Kyu Hyun Yang; Je Huyn Yoo; Han Kook Yoon; Hui Wan Park
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk factors for over-telescoping in reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuta Izawa; Kentaro Futamura; Hiroko Murakami; Tetsuya Shirakawa; Masahiro Nishida; Tomonori Baba; Yoshihiko Tsuchida
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-04-11

2.  [Research on the classification criteria of femoral intertrochanteric fractures based on irreducibility or not].

Authors:  Yifeng Zhao; Fenghua Zhu; Qinghua Chang; Jiheng Liu; Rui Zhang; Fuqiang Song; Fenglong Chu; Qingshu Zai; Wei Guo; Xianwei Yang; Qiang Shi; Feng Zhang; Haibin Wang; Zhen Jiang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-09-15

3.  [Treatment of irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fracture with minimally invasive clamp reduction technique via anterior approach].

Authors:  Yifeng Zhao; Zhen Jiang; Tao Li; Chongyang Xu; Liang Han; Fenglong Chu; Bin Wu; Ming Gao; Haibin Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-05-15

4.  The efficacy of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures who received surgery: study protocol for a randomized, blinded, controlled trial.

Authors:  Mengchen Yin; Yinjie Yan; Zhaoxiang Fan; Niankang Fang; Hongbo Wan; Wen Mo; Xuequn Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.