Literature DB >> 26894134

Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation - Is Proximal Femoral Locked Compression Plate Better Than Dynamic Hip Screw.

Naiyer Asif1, Sohail Ahmad2, Owais Ahmad Qureshi3, Latif Zafar Jilani2, Tajdar Hamesh4, Tariq Jameel5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the most common fractures encountered in our practice. Most of them need operative intervention and union is achieved. As per the literature dynamic hip screw (DHS) is the gold standard for the treatment of these fractures, however problem arises with maintenance of neck shaft angle and proper reduction in unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The situation gets more complex when "cut out" of femoral head screw occurs either alone or in combination with varus collapse when they are treated with DHS. Here we are giving results of unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with Proximal Femoral Locked Compression Plate (PFLCP) as compared with similar patients treated with Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 27 patients (17 males, 10 females) with unstable intertrochanteric fractures who were subjected to PFLCP treatment from March 2011 to November 2012 in one group. Another was a similar group of 35 patients treated with DHS from March 2008 to February 2010. Results of group 1 were compared with group 2. Detailed clinical conditions of all patients, duration of surgery, blood loss, length of incision and duration of image intensifier use were recorded. Patients were revisited at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after operation. Results were evaluated clinically by Harris hip Score and radiologically for fracture union. Progress of union and complications (limb shortening, varus collapse, cut out of femoral head screw and medialization of distal fragment) were recorded.
RESULTS: Among 27 patients treated with PFLCP, one patient expired 6 week postoperatively and one patient lost to follow up, so 25 patients were evaluated for final outcome of which 23 (92%) showed union at follow up of 12 months. One patient developed bending of proximal screws and three developed varus collapse. Among the group treated with DHS, eight patients developed varus collapse, seven developed medialization and three had femoral head screw cut out. According to Harris hip Score 88% cases had good to excellent result in PFLCP group whereas only 60% cases in the DHS group had good to excellent result.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locked plate (PFLCP) can give good healing, with a limited occurrence of complication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Harris hip Score; Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO); Varus collapse

Year:  2016        PMID: 26894134      PMCID: PMC4740662          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/11179.7084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  18 in total

1.  Treatment of complex proximal femoral fractures with the proximal femur locking compression plate.

Authors:  Erik A Hasenboehler; Juan F Agudelo; Steven J Morgan; Wade R Smith; David J Hak; Philip F Stahel
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Christophe Sadowski; Anne Lübbeke; Marc Saudan; Nicolas Riand; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail.

Authors:  Xu Yaozeng; Geng Dechun; Yang Huilin; Zhu Guangming; Wang Xianbin
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  The use of the long gamma nail in proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  K Sehat; R P Baker; G Pattison; R Price; W J Harries; T J S Chesser
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Fixation failure of the LCP proximal femoral plate 4.5/5.0 in patients with missing posteromedial support in unstable per-, inter-, and subtrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Karl Wieser; Reto Babst
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Evaluation of proximal femoral locking plate in unstable extracapsular proximal femoral fractures: Surgical technique & mid term follow up results.

Authors:  Nishikant Kumar; Himanshu Kataria; Chandrashekhar Yadav; Bharath S Gadagoli; Rishi Raj
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-09-10

7.  Exercise and other factors in the prevention of hip fracture: the Leisure World study.

Authors:  A Paganini-Hill; A Chao; R K Ross; B E Henderson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Failure of proximal femoral locking compression plate: a case series.

Authors:  Philip J Glassner; Nirmal C Tejwani
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  [Long-term radiographic complications following treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures with the proximal femoral nail and effects on functional results].

Authors:  Metin Uzun; Erden Ertürer; Irfan Oztürk; Senol Akman; Faik Seçkin; Ismail Bülent Ozçelik
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.511

10.  Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  F Fogagnolo; M Kfuri; C A J Paccola
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  7 in total

1.  Complications following proximal femoral locking compression plating in unstable proximal femur fractures: medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  Sandro Hodel; Frank J P Beeres; Reto Babst; Björn-Christian Link
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-25

2.  A comparative study of Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) versus Dynamic Condylar Screw (DCS) in management of unstable trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Md Faraz Jamil; Julfiqar Mohd; Mazhar Abbas; Yasir Salam Siddiqui; Mohammad Jesan Khan
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Factors related to infection after fixation in the process of late healed bone fracture.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhang; Xuebin Zhan; Peng Zou; Huixia An
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Dynamic hip screw versus proximal femur locking compression plate in intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31A1 and 31A2): A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Prabhat Agrawal; Sahil Gaba; Saubhik Das; Ranjit Singh; Arvind Kumar; Gajanand Yadav
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

5.  Fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures using the SIGN intramedullary nail augmented by a lateral plate in a resource-limited setting without intraoperative fluoroscopy: assessment of functional outcomes at one-year follow-up at Juba Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Mapuor M M Areu; Ericka P von Kaeppler; Brian Billy Madison; Akau A Aguto; James Alphones; Lewis G Zirkle; Saam Morshed; David W Shearer
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2021-07-16

6.  Comparing the Intramedullary Nail and Extramedullary Fixation in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Wen-Qiang Zhang; Jian Sun; Chun-Yu Liu; Hong-Yao Zhao; Yi-Feng Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High failure rate of proximal femoral locking plates in fixation of trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Shuangjian He; Bin Yan; Jian Zhu; Xiaoyi Huang; Jianning Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.