Literature DB >> 21656037

[Trochanteric femoral fractures: anatomy, biomechanics and choice of implants].

F Bonnaire1, T Lein, P Bula.   

Abstract

The objective of any surgical care of a trochanteric femoral fracture should be the achievement of a stable osteosynthesis that allows early full weight-bearing mobilisation of the patient, because long-term immobilisation soon becomes a vital threat to the affected patients who are usually elderly with correlating comorbidities. The anatomical references of the proximal femur and the structure of the hip joint contain some specifics that play an essential role in the incurrence of a trochanteric femoral fracture and the planning of the osteosynthesis as well. With reposition and fracture stabilisation particular importance must be attached to the collo-diaphyseal and the antetorsion angle so that they do not interfere with the functional interaction of the hip and knee joint. Uncomplex trochanteric fractures ordinarily stabilise sufficiently after reposition so that even an extramedullary implant can ensure full weight-bearing stability. With evermore distal fracture course and intertrochanteric comminution zone, rotational instability and pivot transfer of the fracture area to lateral and caudal are followed by an increase of the dislocating forces. These kinds of fractures (A2 and A3 according to the AO/ASIF classification) profit from an intramedullary and rotationally stable osteosynthesis. Basically primary total hip arthroplasty is a potential option for surgical care of a trochanteric fracture in elderly patients with relevant coxarthrosis. However this procedure can only be recommended in cases of a stable uncomplex fracture. The more the medial interlocking of the proximal femur is destroyed the more difficult it will be to primarily implant a total hip prosthesis with good offset and without a varus and rotational failure in the fracture zone.The current studies in the main show disadvantages due to increased complications in these patients, so that in cases of an unstable trochanteric fracture a primary osteosynthesis should be performed followed by total hip arthroplasty after fracture consolidation has occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656037     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-011-1973-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  25 in total

1.  The role of cephalo-condylic nailing of the proximal femur in terms of the basic stability of inter-trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Helen Handoll; Martyn Parker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Clinical comparison of the second and third generation of intramedullary devices for trochanteric fractures of the hip--Blade vs screw.

Authors:  Andreas Lenich; Helen Vester; Michael Nerlich; Edgar Mayr; Ulrich Stöckle; Bernd Füchtmeier
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  S Papasimos; C M Koutsojannis; A Panagopoulos; P Megas; E Lambiris
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Christophe Sadowski; Anne Lübbeke; Marc Saudan; Nicolas Riand; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Eric Strauss; Joshua Frank; Jason Lee; Frederick J Kummer; Nirmal Tejwani
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 6.  Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.

Authors:  M J Parker; H H G Handoll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

7.  [Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN)].

Authors:  S Nuber; T Schönweiss; A Rüter
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  F Fogagnolo; M Kfuri; C A J Paccola
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  [Gamma nail in the treatment of closed trochanteric fractures. Results and indications apropos of 121 cases].

Authors:  I Kempf; A Grosse; G Taglang; E Favreul
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1993

10.  ["Cutting out" in pertrochanteric fractures--problem of osteoporosis?].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; A Weber; O Bösl; C Eckhardt; K Schwieger; B Linke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.000

View more
  15 in total

1.  The influence of pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis on functional outcome after trochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Benjamin Buecking; Tim Schwarting; Florian Debus; Steffen Ruchholtz; Christoph Bliemel; Michael Frink; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  G H Sandmann; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  The hip prosthesis in lateral femur fracture: current concepts and surgical technique.

Authors:  Stefano Giannotti; Vanna Bottai; Giacomo Dell'Osso; Gaia De Paola; Giulia Bugelli; Giulio Guido
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  [Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur. What's new?].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; C Straßberger; M Kieb; P Bula
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  [Hip fractures in the elderly : Osteosynthesis versus joint replacement].

Authors:  M Knobe; C H Siebert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [The rotationally stable screw-anchor with trochanteric stabilizing plate (RoSA/TSP) : First results in unstable trochanteric femur fractures].

Authors:  K-J Maier; B Bücking; K Horst; H Andruszkow; F Hildebrand; M Knobe
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Proximal Femoral Plate, Intramedullary Nail Fixation Versus Hip Arthroplasty for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture in the Elderly: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Shawky El Madboh; Lotfy Mohamed Abd ElKader Yonis; Ibrahim Ali Kabbash; Ahmed Mohamed Samy; Mohamed Abd Elhamed Romeih
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.033

8.  Combined bilateral femoral head necrosis and pertrochanteric fracture: a case report.

Authors:  Bogdan Deleanu; Radu Prejbeanu; Dan Crisan; Dinu Vermesan; Vlad Predescu; Eleftherios Tsiridis
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-13

9.  InterTan nail versus Gamma3 nail for intramedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Dankai Wu; Guangkai Ren; Chuangang Peng; Xuanlin Zheng; Fengmin Mao; Yueyang Zhang
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Use of the Gamma3™ nail in a teaching hospital for trochanteric fractures: mechanical complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life.

Authors:  Benjamin Buecking; Christopher Bliemel; Johannes Struewer; Daphne Eschbach; Steffen Ruchholtz; Thorben Müller
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.