Literature DB >> 13680049

The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release.

Jesko L Verhey1, Daniel Pressnitzer, Ian M Winter.   

Abstract

The ability to detect auditory signals from background noise may be enhanced by the addition of energy in frequency regions well removed from the frequency of the signal. However, it is important that this energy is amplitude-modulated in a coherent way across frequencies, i.e. comodulated. This enhancement of signal detectability is known as comodulation masking release (CMR), and in this review we show that CMR is largest if: (1) the total masker's bandwidth is large, (2) the modulation frequency is low, (3) the modulation depth is high, (4) the envelope is regular and, (5) the masker's spectrum level is high. Possible physiological correlates of CMR have been found at different levels of the auditory pathway. Current hypotheses for the underlying physiological mechanisms, including wide-band inhibition or the disruption of masker modulation envelope response, are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13680049     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1607-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  52 in total

1.  Comodulation masking release as a function of level.

Authors:  B C Moore; M J Shailer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and test frequency.

Authors:  M P Haggard; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Some factors influencing comodulation masking release and across-channel masking.

Authors:  M L Hicks; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of centrifugal pathways on forward masking of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons.

Authors:  S E Shore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Structural and functional properties distinguish two types of multipolar cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  P H Smith; W S Rhode
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-04-22       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Recovery of forward-masked responses in ventral cochlear nucleus neurons.

Authors:  S E Shore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Comodulation masking release for single and multiple rates of envelope fluctuation.

Authors:  D A Eddins; B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  27 in total

1.  Detection of spectrally complex signals in comodulated maskers: effect of temporal fringe.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; Debora R Hatch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to SAM tones located in inhibitory response areas.

Authors:  Hongzhe Li; Jennifer H Sabes; Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Superposition of masking releases.

Authors:  Bastian Epp; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively.

Authors:  Torsten Dau; Stephan Ewert; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Masking release in temporally fluctuating noise depends on comodulation and overall level in Cope's gray treefrog.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Alejandro Vélez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comodulation masking release in the inferior colliculus by combined signal enhancement and masker reduction.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Diepenbrock; Marcus Jeschke; Frank W Ohl; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Masking release for sweeping masker components with correlated envelopes.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Hendrike Klein-Hennig; Bastian Epp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-28

10.  Within- and across-channel factors in the multiband comodulation masking release paradigm.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.