Literature DB >> 1939887

Comodulation masking release as a function of level.

B C Moore1, M J Shailer.   

Abstract

These experiments examine the effects of masker level on the magnitude of comodulation masking release (CMR). In experiment 1, threshold was measured for detecting a 2000-Hz signal in noise bands 100 or 3200 Hz wide, centered at the signal frequency. The noise was either amplitude modulated by a low-pass-filtered noise, or was unmodulated. At noise spectrum levels of 30 and 50 dB, thresholds were lower in the 3200-Hz-wide modulated noise than in the 100-Hz-wide modulated noise or the 3200-Hz-wide unmodulated noise, indicating a CMR. The magnitude of this CMR decreased at a noise spectrum level of 10 dB, and was very small at a spectrum level of -10 dB. In experiment 2, threshold was measured for a 700-Hz signal centered in a 20-Hz wide band of noise (the on-frequency band, OFB), both in the presence and absence of eight flanking bands (FBs) whose envelopes were either identical with that of the OFB (correlated condition) or were uncorrelated. Thresholds were lower in the correlated than in the uncorrelated condition, indicating a CMR. When the OFB and the FBs were presented to the same ear, the CMR decreased when the spectrum level of all bands was below 30 dB, or when the spectrum level of the FBs was decreased below 40 dB keeping the level of the OFB constant at 40 dB. When the OFB and the FBs were presented to opposite ears, the CMR decreased when the spectrum level of all bands was decreased below 30 dB or when the spectrum level of the FBs was decreased below 40 dB, keeping the level of the OFB fixed at 40 or 60 dB. However, the CMR was almost independent of the spectrum level of the OFB (over the range 10-70 dB) when the spectrum level of the FBs was held constant at 60 dB. The results are interpreted in terms of perceptual grouping mechanisms. Implications for the measurement of CMR in hearing-impaired subjects are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1939887     DOI: 10.1121/1.401950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

Review 1.  The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Daniel Pressnitzer; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Superposition of masking releases.

Authors:  Bastian Epp; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Masking release in temporally fluctuating noise depends on comodulation and overall level in Cope's gray treefrog.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Alejandro Vélez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Factors contributing to comodulation masking release with dichotic maskers.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Yi-Wen Chen; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of temporal coherence and temporal predictability in the build-up of auditory grouping.

Authors:  Joseph Sollini; Katarina C Poole; Dominic Blauth-Muszkowski; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 8.  Temporal cues and the effect of their enhancement on speech perception in older adults - A scoping review.

Authors:  Hemanth Narayan Shetty
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2016-08-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.