Literature DB >> 7814760

Comodulation masking release for single and multiple rates of envelope fluctuation.

D A Eddins1, B A Wright.   

Abstract

Two experiments are presented that investigate the influence of envelope fluctuation rate upon the magnitude of comodulation masking release (CMR). In Experiment 1, thresholds were measured for a tonal signal centered in either one or five masker bands. The maskers were either narrow-band noises or 100% sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones. The five masker bands had either the same (coherent) or different (incoherent) envelopes. Envelope rate was varied by manipulating either the noise bandwidth (10-200 Hz) or the SAM rate (10-128 Hz). The CMR values were largest for slow envelope rates. In Experiment 2, envelope coherence was simultaneously manipulated at two rates by amplitude modulating (10 Hz) narrow-band noises (100 Hz). The modulation depth was 100%, 83%, or 50%. The CMR based on the coherence of the noise carriers was about 5 dB, regardless of the SAM coherence or the modulation depth. The CMR based on the SAM coherence decreased from about 19 to 2 dB as modulation depth decreased, regardless of the noise-carrier coherence. Thresholds were highest when the envelope fluctuations were incoherent at both rates and were lowest when the envelope fluctuations were coherent at both rates. These data suggest that the auditory system is able to make across-frequency envelope comparisons at both envelope rates simultaneously.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7814760     DOI: 10.1121/1.411450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

Review 1.  The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Daniel Pressnitzer; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Detection of spectrally complex signals in comodulated maskers: effect of temporal fringe.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; Debora R Hatch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Across-frequency envelope correlation discrimination and masked signal detection.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Features of across-frequency envelope coherence critical for comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comodulation masking release in the inferior colliculus by combined signal enhancement and masker reduction.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Diepenbrock; Marcus Jeschke; Frank W Ohl; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Assessing the effects of temporal coherence on auditory stream formation through comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Simon Krogholt Christiansen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Target-specific IPSC kinetics promote temporal processing in auditory parallel pathways.

Authors:  Ruili Xie; Paul B Manis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Comodulation masking release in electric hearing.

Authors:  Robert H Pierzycki; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.