Literature DB >> 13679991

Additive transgene expression and genetic introgression in multiple green-fluorescent protein transgenic crop x weed hybrid generations.

M D Halfhill1, R J Millwood, A K Weissinger, S I Warwick, C N Stewart.   

Abstract

The level of transgene expression in crop x weed hybrids and the degree to which crop-specific genes are integrated into hybrid populations are important factors in assessing the potential ecological and agricultural risks of gene flow associated with genetic engineering. The average transgene zygosity and genetic structure of transgenic hybrid populations change with the progression of generations, and the green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgene is an ideal marker to quantify transgene expression in advancing populations. The homozygous T(1) single-locus insert GFP/ Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic canola ( Brassica napus, cv Westar) with two copies of the transgene fluoresced twice as much as hemizygous individuals with only one copy of the transgene. These data indicate that the expression of the GFP gene was additive, and fluorescence could be used to determine zygosity status. Several hybrid generations (BC(1)F(1), BC(2)F(1)) were produced by backcrossing various GFP/Bt transgenic canola ( B. napus, cv Westar) and birdseed rape ( Brassica rapa) hybrid generations onto B. rapa. Intercrossed generations (BC(2)F(2) Bulk) were generated by crossing BC(2)F(1) individuals in the presence of a pollinating insect ( Musca domestica L.). The ploidy of plants in the BC(2)F(2) Bulk hybrid generation was identical to the weedy parental species, B. rapa. AFLP analysis was used to quantify the degree of B. napus introgression into multiple backcross hybrid generations with B. rapa. The F(1) hybrid generations contained 95-97% of the B. napus-specific AFLP markers, and each successive backcross generation demonstrated a reduction of markers resulting in the 15-29% presence in the BC(2)F(2) Bulk population. Average fluorescence of each successive hybrid generation was analyzed, and homozygous canola lines and hybrid populations that contained individuals homozygous for GFP (BC(2)F(2) Bulk) demonstrated significantly higher fluorescence than hemizygous hybrid generations (F(1), BC(1)F(1) and BC(2)F(1)). These data demonstrate that the formation of homozygous individuals within hybrid populations increases the average level of transgene expression as generations progress. This phenomenon must be considered in the development of risk-management strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13679991     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1397-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  14 in total

1.  Non-invasive quantitative detection and applications of non-toxic, S65T-type green fluorescent protein in living plants.

Authors:  Y Niwa; T Hirano; K Yoshimoto; M Shimizu; H Kobayashi
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 2.  Use of matrix attachment regions (MARs) to minimize transgene silencing.

Authors:  G C Allen; S Spiker; W F Thompson
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Instrumentation and methodology for quantifying GFP fluorescence in intact plant organs.

Authors:  R J Millwood; M D Halfhill; D Harkins; R Russotti; C N Stewart
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.993

4.  Quantitative GFP fluorescence as an indicator of recombinant protein synthesis in transgenic plants.

Authors:  H A Richards; M D Halfhill; R J Millwood; C N Stewart
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  The effect of T-DNA copy number, position and methylation on reporter gene expression in tobacco transformants.

Authors:  S L Hobbs; P Kpodar; C M DeLong
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  Bt-transgenic oilseed rape hybridization with its weedy relative, Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Matthew D Halfhill; Reginald J Millwood; Paul L Raymer; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2002-10

7.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  P Vos; R Hogers; M Bleeker; M Reijans; T van de Lee; M Hornes; A Frijters; J Pot; J Peleman; M Kuiper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Removal of a cryptic intron and subcellular localization of green fluorescent protein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis plants brightly.

Authors:  J Haseloff; K R Siemering; D C Prasher; S Hodge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genetic transformation, recovery, and characterization of fertile soybean transgenic for a synthetic Bacillus thuringiensis cryIAc gene.

Authors:  C N Stewart; M J Adang; J N All; H R Boerma; G Cardineau; D Tucker; W A Parrott
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Field performance of derived generations of transgenic tobacco.

Authors:  P D Caligari; Y M Yapabandara; E M Paul; J Perret; P Roger; J M Dunwell
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  18 in total

1.  Quantitative GFP fluorescence as an indicator of recombinant protein synthesis in transgenic plants.

Authors:  H A Richards; M D Halfhill; R J Millwood; C N Stewart
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Changes in fitness-associated traits due to the stacking of transgenic glyphosate resistance and insect resistance in Brassica napus L.

Authors:  J P Londo; M A Bollman; C L Sagers; E H Lee; L S Watrud
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Laser-induced fluorescence imaging and spectroscopy of GFP transgenic plants.

Authors:  C Neal Stewart; Reginald J Millwood; Matthew D Halfhill; Mentewab Ayalew; Vinitha Cardoza; Mitra Kooshki; Gene A Capelle; Kevin R Kyle; David Piaseki; Gregory McCrum; John Di Benedetto
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Hexameric GFP and mCherry reporters for the Drosophila GAL4, Q, and LexA transcription systems.

Authors:  Harold K Shearin; Ian S Macdonald; Laura P Spector; R Steven Stowers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?

Authors:  Vassili V Velkov; Alexander B Medvinsky; Mikhail S Sokolov; Anatoly I Marchenko
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Variability of CP4 EPSPS expression in genetically engineered soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill).

Authors:  Parimala Chinnadurai; Duška Stojšin; Kang Liu; Gregory E Frierdich; Kevin C Glenn; Tao Geng; Adam Schapaugh; Keguo Huang; Andrew E Deffenbaugh; Zi L Liu; Luis A Burzio
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Glyphosate drift promotes changes in fitness and transgene gene flow in canola (Brassica napus) and hybrids.

Authors:  Jason P Londo; Nonnatus S Bautista; Cynthia L Sagers; E Henry Lee; Lidia S Watrud
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Pollen-mediated gene flow in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): can genetically engineered and organic flax coexist?

Authors:  A J Jhala; H Bhatt; K Topinka; L M Hall
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Dispersal and persistence of genetically modified oilseed rape around Japanese harbors.

Authors:  Masaharu Kawata; Kikuko Murakami; Toyohisa Ishikawa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Genetic load and transgenic mitigating genes in transgenic Brassica rapa (field mustard) x Brassica napus (oilseed rape) hybrid populations.

Authors:  Christy W Rose; Reginald J Millwood; Hong S Moon; Murali R Rao; Matthew D Halfhill; Paul L Raymer; Suzanne I Warwick; Hani Al-Ahmad; Jonathan Gressel; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 2.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.