BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the advent of transgenic crops, genetically modified, herbicide-resistant Brassica napus has become a model system for examining the risks and potential ecological consequences of escape of transgenes from cultivation into wild compatible species. Escaped transgenic feral B. napus and hybrids with compatible weedy species have been identified outside of agriculture and without the apparent selection for herbicide resistance. However, herbicide (glyphosate) exposure can extend beyond crop field boundaries, and a drift-level of herbicide could function as a selective agent contributing to increased persistence of transgenes in the environment. METHODS: The effects of a drift level (0·1 × the field application rate) of glyphosate herbicide and varied levels of plant competition were examined on plant fitness-associated traits and gene flow in a simulated field plot, common garden experiment. Plants included transgenic, glyphosate-resistant B. napus, its weedy ancestor B. rapa, and hybrid and advanced generations derived from them. KEY RESULTS: The results of this experiment demonstrate reductions in reproductive fitness for non-transgenic genotypes and a contrasting increase in plant fitness for transgenic genotypes as a result of glyphosate-drift treatments. Results also suggest that a drift level of glyphosate spray may influence the movement of transgenes among transgenic crops and weeds and alter the processes of hybridization and introgression in non-agronomic habitats by impacting flowering phenology and pollen availability within the community. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate the potential for persistence of glyphosate resistance transgenes in weedy plant communities due to the effect of glyphosate spray drift on plant fitness. Additionally, glyphosate drift has the potential to change the gene-flow dynamics between compatible transgenic crops and weeds, simultaneously reducing direct introgression into weedy species while contributing to an increase in the transgenic seed bank.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the advent of transgenic crops, genetically modified, herbicide-resistant Brassica napus has become a model system for examining the risks and potential ecological consequences of escape of transgenes from cultivation into wild compatible species. Escaped transgenic feral B. napus and hybrids with compatible weedy species have been identified outside of agriculture and without the apparent selection for herbicide resistance. However, herbicide (glyphosate) exposure can extend beyond crop field boundaries, and a drift-level of herbicide could function as a selective agent contributing to increased persistence of transgenes in the environment. METHODS: The effects of a drift level (0·1 × the field application rate) of glyphosate herbicide and varied levels of plant competition were examined on plant fitness-associated traits and gene flow in a simulated field plot, common garden experiment. Plants included transgenic, glyphosate-resistant B. napus, its weedy ancestor B. rapa, and hybrid and advanced generations derived from them. KEY RESULTS: The results of this experiment demonstrate reductions in reproductive fitness for non-transgenic genotypes and a contrasting increase in plant fitness for transgenic genotypes as a result of glyphosate-drift treatments. Results also suggest that a drift level of glyphosate spray may influence the movement of transgenes among transgenic crops and weeds and alter the processes of hybridization and introgression in non-agronomic habitats by impacting flowering phenology and pollen availability within the community. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate the potential for persistence of glyphosate resistance transgenes in weedy plant communities due to the effect of glyphosate spray drift on plant fitness. Additionally, glyphosate drift has the potential to change the gene-flow dynamics between compatible transgenic crops and weeds, simultaneously reducing direct introgression into weedy species while contributing to an increase in the transgenic seed bank.
Authors: Mike J Wilkinson; Luisa J Elliott; Joël Allainguillaume; Michael W Shaw; Carol Norris; Ruth Welters; Matthew Alexander; Jeremy Sweet; David C Mason Journal: Science Date: 2003-10-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Matthew D Halfhill; Bin Zhu; Suzanne I Warwick; Paul L Raymer; Reginald J Millwood; Arthur K Weissinger; C Neal Stewart Journal: Environ Biosafety Res Date: 2004 Apr-Jun
Authors: Lidia S Watrud; George King; Jason P Londo; Ricardo Colasanti; Bonnie M Smith; Ronald S Waschmann; E Henry Lee Journal: Ecol Appl Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.657
Authors: Loren H Rieseberg; Seung-Chul Kim; Rebecca A Randell; Kenneth D Whitney; Briana L Gross; Christian Lexer; Keith Clay Journal: Genetica Date: 2006-09-06 Impact factor: 1.082
Authors: J Allainguillaume; M Alexander; J M Bullock; M Saunders; C J Allender; G King; C S Ford; M J Wilkinson Journal: Mol Ecol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 6.185
Authors: David Olszyk; Thomas Pfleeger; Tamotsu Shiroyama; Matthew Blakeley-Smith; E Henry Lee; Milton Plocher Journal: Environ Toxicol Chem Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 3.742
Authors: J Franzaring; K Wedlich; A Fangmeier; S Eckert; J Zipperle; I Krah-Jentgens; C Hünig; W Züghart Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Hanspeter Naegeli; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Francisco Javier Moreno; Ewen Mullins; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Michele Ardizzone; Yann Devos; Silvia Federici; Antonio Fernandez Dumont; Andrea Gennaro; Jose Ángel Gómez Ruiz; Franco Maria Neri; Nikoletta Papadopoulou; Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos; Anna Lanzoni Journal: EFSA J Date: 2021-06-17