Literature DB >> 16184014

Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?

Vassili V Velkov1, Alexander B Medvinsky, Mikhail S Sokolov, Anatoly I Marchenko.   

Abstract

Transgenic insecticidal plants based on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) endotoxins, on proteinase inhibitors and on lectins, and transgenic herbicide tolerant plants are widely used in modern agriculture. The results of the studies on likelihood and non-likelihood of adverse effects of transgenic plants on the environment including: (i) effects on nontarget species; (ii) invasiveness; (iii) potential for transgenes to 'escape' into the environment by horizontal gene transfer; and (iv) adverse effects on soil biota are reviewed. In general, it seems that large-scale implementation of transgenic insecticidal and herbicide tolerant plants do not display considerable negative effects on the environments and, moreover, at least some transgenic plants can improve the corresponding environments and human health because their production considerably reduces the load of chemical insecticides and herbicides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16184014     DOI: 10.1007/bf02703726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  79 in total

1.  Environmental biosafety and transgenic potato in a centre of diversity for this crop.

Authors:  Carolina Celis; Maria Scurrah; Sue Cowgill; Susana Chumbiauca; Jayne Green; Javier Franco; Gladys Main; Daan Kiezebrink; Richard G F Visser; Howard J Atkinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Selection of relevant non-target herbivores for monitoring the environmental effects of Bt maize pollen.

Authors:  Gregor Schmitz; Detlef Bartsch; Peter Pretscher
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

3.  Effects of exposure to event 176 Bacillus thuringiensis corn pollen on monarch and black swallowtail caterpillars under field conditions.

Authors:  A R Zangerl; D McKenna; C L Wraight; M Carroll; P Ficarello; R Warner; M R Berenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants.

Authors:  A M Shelton; J-Z Zhao; R T Roush
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

5.  Effects of weed management systems on canopy insects in herbicide-resistant soybeans.

Authors:  L D Buckelew; L P Pedigo; H M Mero; M D Owen; G L Tylka
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Transformation of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413(pFG4DeltanptII) with transgenic plant DNA in soil microcosms and effects of kanamycin on selection of transformants.

Authors:  K M Nielsen; J D van Elsas; K Smalla
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Between myth and reality: genetically modified maize, an example of a sizeable scientific controversy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Wisniewski; Nathalie Frangne; Agnès Massonneau; Christian Dumas
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.079

8.  Pear transformed with a lytic peptide gene for disease control affects nontarget organism, pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae).

Authors:  Gary J Puterka; Chris Bocchetti; Phat Dang; R L Bell; Ralph Scorza
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Bt sweet corn and selective insecticides: impacts on pests and predators.

Authors:  Fred R Musser; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Spread of recombinant DNA by roots and pollen of transgenic potato plants, identified by highly specific biomonitoring using natural transformation of an Acinetobacter sp.

Authors:  Johann de Vries; Martin Heine; Klaus Harms; Wilfried Wackernagel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  6 in total

1.  The future of science: food and water for life.

Authors:  Nancy A Eckardt; Eleonora Cominelli; Massimo Galbiati; Chiara Tonelli
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Beyond risk. A more realistic risk-benefit analysis of agricultural biotechnologies.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Zahra Meghani
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Do genetically modified plants impact arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi?

Authors:  Wenke Liu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Characterization and fine mapping of a female fertility associated gene Ff1(t) in rice.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Song Yan; Renliang Huang; Shan Zhu; Hongliang Xiong; Zhiqin Peng; Qingyou Zhou; Yingjin Huang; Xianhua Shen
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Temporal dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities in a genetically modified (GM) rice ecosystem.

Authors:  Seung-Hoon Lee; Chang-Gi Kim; Hojeong Kang
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 6.  Lectins: production and practical applications.

Authors:  Sze Kwan Lam; Tzi Bun Ng
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 4.813

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.