Literature DB >> 20551976

Pollen-mediated gene flow in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): can genetically engineered and organic flax coexist?

A J Jhala1, H Bhatt, K Topinka, L M Hall.   

Abstract

Coexistence allows growers and consumers the choice of producing or purchasing conventional or organic crops with known standards for adventitious presence of genetically engineered (GE) seed. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) is multipurpose oilseed crop in which product diversity and utility could be enhanced for industrial, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical markets through genetic engineering. If GE flax were released commercially, pollen-mediated gene flow will determine in part whether GE flax could coexist without compromising other markets. As a part of pre-commercialization risk assessment, we quantified pollen-mediated gene flow between two cultivars of flax. Field experiments were conducted at four locations during 2006 and 2007 in western Canada using a concentric donor (20 × 20 m) receptor (120 × 120 m) design. Gene flow was detected through the xenia effect of dominant alleles of high α-linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3(cisΔ9,12,15)) to the low ALA trait. Seeds were harvested from the pollen recipient plots up to a distance of 50 m in eight directions from the pollen donor. High ALA seeds were identified using a thiobarbituric acid test and served as a marker for gene flow. Binomial distribution and power analysis were used to predict the minimum number of seeds statistically required to detect the frequency of gene flow at specific α (confidence interval) and power (1-β) values. As a result of the low frequency of gene flow, approximately 4 million seeds were screened to derive accurate quantification. Frequency of gene flow was highest near the source: averaging 0.0185 at 0.1 m but declined rapidly with distance, 0.0013 and 0.00003 at 3 and 35 m, respectively. Gene flow was reduced to 50% (O₅₀) and 90% (O₉₀) between 0.85 to 2.64 m, and 5.68 to 17.56 m, respectively. No gene flow was detected at any site or year > 35 m distance from the pollen source, suggesting that frequency of gene flow was ≤ 0.00003 (P = 0.95). Although it is not possible to eliminate all adventitious presence caused by pollen-mediated gene flow, through harvest blending and the use of buffer zones between GE and conventional flax fields, it could be minimized. Managing other sources of adventitious presence including seed mixing and volunteer populations may be more problematic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551976      PMCID: PMC3183899          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  21 in total

1.  The thiobarbituric acid reaction and the autoxidations of polyunsaturated fatty acid methyl esters.

Authors:  L K DAHLE; E G HILL; R T HOLMAN
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1962-08       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 2.  Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Stuart Smyth; Alan McHughen
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 3.  Management of herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape in Europe: a case study on minimizing vertical gene flow.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Dirk Reheul; Adinda de Schrijver; François Cors; William Moens
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep

4.  Crop-to-crop gene flow using farm scale sites of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in the UK.

Authors:  Rebecca Weekes; Carola Deppe; Theo Allnutt; Caroline Boffey; Derek Morgan; Sarah Morgan; Mark Bilton; Roger Daniels; Christine Henry
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Assessment of real-time PCR based methods for quantification of pollen-mediated gene flow from GM to conventional maize in a field study.

Authors:  Maria Pla; José-Luis La Paz; Gisela Peñas; Nora García; Montserrat Palaudelmàs; Teresa Esteve; Joaquima Messeguer; Enric Melé
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Validation of PCR methods for quantitation of genetically modified plants in food.

Authors:  P Hübner; H U Waiblinger; K Pietsch; P Brodmann
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.913

7.  Polyhydroxybutyrate synthesis in transgenic flax.

Authors:  Magdalena Wróbel; Jacek Zebrowski; Jan Szopa
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Evaluation of crossability between triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) and common wheat, durum wheat and rye.

Authors:  Melissa J Hills; Linda M Hall; Doug F Messenger; Robert J Graf; Brian L Beres; François Eudes
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2008-02-21

9.  Gene flow from GM glyphosate-tolerant to conventional soybeans under field conditions in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Yoshimura; Kazuhito Matsuo; Koji Yasuda
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2007-03-28

10.  Pollen-mediated gene flow from transgenic safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) intended for plant molecular farming to conventional safflower.

Authors:  Marc A McPherson; Allen G Good; A Keith C Topinka; Rong-Cai Yang; Ross H McKenzie; R Jason Cathcart; Jed A Christianson; Curtis Strobeck; Linda M Hall
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2009-02-11
View more
  12 in total

1.  Does flax have the answer to the GM mix-up?

Authors:  M J Wilkinson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Bidirectional but asymmetrical sexual hybridization between Brassica carinata and Sinapis arvensis (Brassicaceae).

Authors:  Kyle W Cheung; Fakhria M Razeq; Connie A Sauder; Tracey James; Sara L Martin
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Pollen-mediated transfer of herbicide resistance between johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotypes.

Authors:  Aniruddha Maity; Blake Young; Nithya Subramanian; Muthukumar Bagavathiannan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Rapid transgenerational adaptation in response to intercropping reduces competition.

Authors:  Laura Stefan; Nadine Engbersen; Christian Schöb
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Molecular markers as a complementary tool in risk assessments: quantifying interspecific gene flow from triticale to spring wheat and durum wheat.

Authors:  Vanessa B Kavanagh; Melissa J Hills; Aakash Goyal; Harpinder S Randhawa; A Keith Topinka; Francois Eudes; Linda M Hall
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Characterization of competitive interactions in the coexistence of Bt-transgenic and conventional rice.

Authors:  Yongbo Liu; Feng Ge; Yuyong Liang; Gang Wu; Junsheng Li
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.563

7.  The LuWD40-1 gene encoding WD repeat protein regulates growth and pollen viability in flax (Linum Usitatissimum L.).

Authors:  Santosh Kumar; Mark C Jordan; Raju Datla; Sylvie Cloutier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fitness dynamics within a poplar hybrid zone: II. Impact of exotic sex on native poplars in an urban jungle.

Authors:  Amanda D Roe; Chris Jk MacQuarrie; Marie-Claude Gros-Louis; J Dale Simpson; Josyanne Lamarche; Tannis Beardmore; Stacey L Thompson; Philippe Tanguay; Nathalie Isabel
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Investigating Pollen and Gene Flow of WYMV-Resistant Transgenic Wheat N12-1 Using a Dwarf Male-Sterile Line as the Pollen Receptor.

Authors:  Shanshan Dong; Yan Liu; Cigang Yu; Zhenhua Zhang; Ming Chen; Changyong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Modeling pollen-mediated gene flow from glyphosate-resistant to -susceptible giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) under field conditions.

Authors:  Zahoor A Ganie; Amit J Jhala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.