Literature DB >> 1342403

The effects of dynamic visual stimulation on perception and motor control.

F H Previc1.   

Abstract

A set of research findings is described that deals with three principal laboratory measures of visual orientation (vection and postural and manual control). Two studies are highlighted, one of which compared the latencies of vection and visually induced postural change and the other of which investigated manual tracking under visually disorienting conditions. The first study showed that although vection and postural change are somewhat related to each other (for example, both were greater in response to roll and pitch as opposed to linear visual motion), the onset of vection is delayed by several seconds relative to the initiation of visually induced postural shifts. The second study showed that manual biases induced by visual roll motion are not overcome using a thumb-and-forefinger (pyramidal) motor strategy, and may not be equivalent to the "giant hand" illusion that is believed to reflect the predominance of the vestibulospinal (extrapyramidal) motor pathways during extreme spatial disorientation. These and other findings indicate that various visual orientation effects may involve at least partially independent mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1342403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  10 in total

1.  Influence of Visual Dependence on Inter-Segmental Coordination during Upright Stance in Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Yawen Yu; Carole A Tucker; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Time series analysis of postural responses to combined visual pitch and support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The effects of background visual roll stimulation on postural and manual control and self-motion perception.

Authors:  F H Previc; R V Kenyon; E R Boer; B H Johnson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07

5.  Continuous visual field motion impacts the postural responses of older and younger women during and after support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Postural and spatial orientation driven by virtual reality.

Authors:  Emily A Keshner; Robert V Kenyon
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2009

7.  Effects of roll visual motion on online control of arm movement: reaching within a dynamic virtual environment.

Authors:  Assaf Y Dvorkin; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effect of depth order on linear vection with optical flows.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Seya; Takayuki Tsuji; Hiroyuki Shinoda
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-12-01

9.  Larger Head Displacement to Optic Flow Presented in the Lower Visual Field.

Authors:  Kanon Fujimoto; Hiroshi Ashida
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-11-22

10.  Reaching within a dynamic virtual environment.

Authors:  Assaf Y Dvorkin; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 4.262

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.