Literature DB >> 1308756

Age as a factor in breast cancer knowledge, attitudes and screening behaviour.

Z Mah1, H Bryant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are age-related differences in knowledge, attitudes and behaviour with respect to breast cancer and whether the differences reflect the age-specific Canadian recommendations on breast cancer screening.
DESIGN: Telephone survey.
SETTING: Two cities and five towns and their surrounding areas in Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: The age-specific, randomly selected sample comprised 1284 women aged 40 to 75 years who did not have breast cancer. Of the 1741 eligible women who were contacted, 1350 (78%) agreed to participate; 66 were excluded because of age ineligibility or a history of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Frequency of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour with respect to breast cancer, by age group.
RESULTS: Knowledge of breast cancer risk factors was generally low and decreased with age. Few women were aware of the Canadian recommendations on breast self-examination, physical examination of the breasts by a health care practitioner and mammographic screening. Older women believed they were less susceptible to breast cancer than younger women and were less likely to have positive attitudes toward screening. Self-examination was performed 9 to 15 times per year by 424 women (33%), and 810 (63%) had been examined by a health care professional in the past year. Although 664 (52%) had undergone mammography, the proportion decreased with age after age 59. The main barriers to mammography were lack of physician referral and the woman's belief that the procedure is unnecessary if she is healthy.
CONCLUSIONS: Education is needed to increase breast cancer knowledge, promote the Canadian recommendations for early detection of breast cancer and decrease negative beliefs about the disease. Changes in the behaviour of women and physicians are needed to increase the use of breast self-examination, clinical breast examination by a health care professional and mammographic screening. Reaching women in the upper range (60 to 69 years) of the target group for mammographic screening should be a focus in promoting early detection of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1308756      PMCID: PMC1492292     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  18 in total

1.  Mammography and age: are we targeting the wrong women? A community survey of women and physicians.

Authors:  R P Harris; S W Fletcher; J J Gonzalez; D R Lannin; D Degnan; J A Earp; R Clark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Measuring the impact of varied interventions of community-wide breast cancer screening.

Authors:  D S Lane; A P Polednak; M A Burg
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1989

3.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Factors influencing women's decision to undergo mammography.

Authors:  J Kruse; D M Phillips
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

6.  Exploration of factors affecting mammography behaviors.

Authors:  D N Rutledge; W H Hartmann; P O Kinman; A C Winfield
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge about mammography among women over forty years of age.

Authors:  S E Slenker; M C Grant
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian Randomized Controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women.

Authors:  A B Miller; G R Howe; C Wall
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 0.825

9.  The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years.

Authors:  D M Eddy; V Hasselblad; W McGivney; W Hendee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-11       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Rome women's screening study: knowledge, attitudes and practices of women regarding screening for breast and cervical cancer.

Authors:  C A Perucci; E Rapiti; M Davoli; S Lagorio; M Arca; A B Miller
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1990-08-31
View more
  15 in total

1.  Changes in Canadian women's mammography rates since the implementation of mass screening programs.

Authors:  C E De Grasse; A M O'Connor; J Boulet; N Edwards; H Bryant; K Breithaupt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Mammography using in a community-based sample of older women.

Authors:  J T Fullerton; D Kritz-Silverstein; G Robins Sadler; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-03

3.  1995 Canadian women's health test. Time to promote women's health.

Authors:  S Wiesenberg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Breast self-examination: resistance to change.

Authors:  M Elisabeth Del Giudice; David Tannenbaum; Pamela J Goodwin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  The views of older women towards mammographic screening: a qualitative and quantitative study.

Authors:  K Collins; M Winslow; M W Reed; S J Walters; T Robinson; J Madan; T Green; H Cocker; L Wyld
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Effectiveness of a culturally integrated liver cancer education in improving HBV knowledge among Asian Americans.

Authors:  Hee-Soon Juon; Byung Joon Park
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Risks and probabilities of breast cancer: short-term versus lifetime probabilities.

Authors:  H E Bryant; P M Brasher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Recruitment for breast screening in a rural practice. Trial of a physician's letter of invitation.

Authors:  B Bass; D Pross; P Bell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Perceived versus objective breast cancer risk in diverse women.

Authors:  Julia Fehniger; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah Karliner; Karla Kerlikowske; Jeffrey A Tice; Jessica Quinn; Elissa Ozanne; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.