Literature DB >> 12964073

Rapid musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging using integrated parallel acquisition techniques (IPAT)--initial experiences.

B Romaneehsen1, K Oberholzer, L P Müller, K-F Kreitner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of using multiple receiver coil elements for time saving integrated parallel imaging techniques (iPAT) in traumatic musculoskeletal disorders.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 6 patients with traumatic derangements of the knee, ankle and hip underwent MR imaging at 1.5 T. For signal detection of the knee and ankle, we used a 6-channel body array coil that was placed around the joints, for hip imaging two 4-channel body array coils and two elements of the spine array coil were combined for signal detection. All patients were investigated with a standard imaging protocol that mainly consisted of different turbo spin-echo sequences (PD-, T (2)-weighted TSE with and without fat suppression, STIR). All sequences were repeated with an integrated parallel acquisition technique (iPAT) using a modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE) technique with an acceleration factor of 2. Overall image quality was subjectively assessed using a five-point scale as well as the ability for detection of pathologic findings.
RESULTS: Regarding overall image quality, there were no significant differences between standard imaging and imaging using mSENSE. All pathologies (occult fracture, meniscal tear, torn and interpositioned Hoffa's cleft, cartilage damage) were detected by both techniques. iPAT led to a 48 % reduction of acquisition time compared with standard technique. Additionally, time savings with iPAT led to a decrease of pain-induced motion artifacts in two cases.
CONCLUSION: In times of increasing cost pressure, iPAT using multiple coil elements seems to be an efficient and economic tool for fast musculoskeletal imaging with diagnostic performance comparable to conventional techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12964073     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  9 in total

1.  Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise.

Authors:  Toni W Vomweg; Andrea Teifke; R Peter Kunz; Christian Hintze; Alexander Hlawatsch; Annett Kern; Karl F Kreitner; Manfred Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Imaging of cartilage].

Authors:  C Glaser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Fast magnetic resonance imaging of the knee using a parallel acquisition technique (mSENSE): a prospective performance evaluation.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; Bernd Romaneehsen; Frank Krummenauer; Katja Oberholzer; Lars Peter Müller; Christoph Düber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR imaging of the cervical spine: assessment of image quality with parallel imaging compared to non-accelerated MR measurements.

Authors:  Iris-M Noebauer-Huhmann; Christian Glaser; Olaf Dietrich; Claus-Peter Wallner; Wolfgang Klinger; Herwig Imhof; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nicolae Bolog; Daniel Nanz; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  MRI of degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison of non-accelerated and parallel imaging.

Authors:  Ingo Nölte; Lars Gerigk; Marc A Brockmann; André Kemmling; Christoph Groden
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  The use of parallel imaging for MRI assessment of knees in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Andrea S Doria; Gulraiz A Chaudry; Cristina Nasui; Tammy Rayner; Chenghua Wang; Rahim Moineddin; Paul S Babyn; Larry M White; Marshall S Sussman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-01

8.  Parallel imaging of the cervical spine at 3T: optimized trade-off between speed and image quality.

Authors:  J Fruehwald-Pallamar; P Szomolanyi; N Fakhrai; A Lunzer; M Weber; M M Thurnher; M Pallamar; S Trattnig; D Prayer; I M Noebauer-Huhmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  MR imaging of the posterolateral corner of the knee.

Authors:  Nicolae Bolog; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.