Literature DB >> 16308695

[Imaging of cartilage].

C Glaser1.   

Abstract

The motivation for cartilage repair is the preservation of adequate joint motion. Repairing joint surface congruity and providing balanced load bearing are crucial for this. MRI can contribute to this goal by describing number, depth, size, and distribution of cartilage lesions throughout the different joint compartments. Essential to such a contribution are adequate spatial resolution at a reasonable SNR together with good contrast between both cartilage and the subchondral bone as well as the joint space. For TSE sequences, this is achieved using TEs between 30 and 50 ms. Diagnostic accuracy is optimal when a lesion is depicted in more than one plane. Short TE, high bandwidth, and the appropriate orientation of the frequency encoding direction contribute to minimizing metal artifacts. Besides internal alterations of the cartilage's matrix, moderately T2-weighted TSE sequences sensitively depict bone marrow edema such as signal alterations and joint effusion, both contributing to highlight even subtle cartilage lesions. T1-weighted FS/WE 3D GE sequences profit from their high spatial resolution to appreciate gradual erosion of the cartilage. In OD the interface to the surrounding bone, the integrity of the overlying cartilage, and associated cysts are used to determine stability. The presence of two or more findings increases diagnostic accuracy. Prognosis is associated with the size of the affected area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16308695     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1287-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  44 in total

1.  Articular cartilage and the magic angle effect.

Authors:  J B Kneeland
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques.

Authors:  M P Recht; J Kramer; S Marcelis; M N Pathria; D Trudell; P Haghighi; D J Sartoris; D Resnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy.

Authors:  F R Noyes; C L Stabler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  Imaging of acute injuries of the articular surfaces (chondral, osteochondral and subchondral fractures).

Authors:  K Bohndorf
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee.

Authors:  L Peterson; T Minas; M Brittberg; A Nilsson; E Sjögren-Jansson; A Lindahl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  High resolution MRI of small joints: impact of spatial resolution on diagnostic performance and SNR.

Authors:  T M Link; S Majumdar; C Peterfy; H E Daldrup; M Uffmann; C Dowling; L Steinbach; H K Genant
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs arthroscopy.

Authors:  L S Broderick; D A Turner; D L Renfrew; T J Schnitzer; J P Huff; C Harris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Fat suppressed MRI of articular cartilage with a spatial-spectral excitation pulse.

Authors:  P A Hardy; M P Recht; D W Piraino
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  MR imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: evaluation of two- and three-dimensional sequences.

Authors:  O Tervonen; M J Dietz; S W Carmichael; R L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Surgical technique.

Authors:  László Hangody; Gábor K Ráthonyi; Zsófia Duska; Gábor Vásárhelyi; Péter Füles; László Módis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Morphological and functional cartilage imaging].

Authors:  C Rehnitz; M-A Weber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Morphological and functional cartilage imaging].

Authors:  C Rehnitz; M-A Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  [Evaluation of cartilage defects in the knee: validity of clinical, magnetic-resonance-imaging and radiological findings compared with arthroscopy].

Authors:  G Spahn; R Wittig; E Kahl; H M Klinger; T Mückley; G O Hofmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  [Update: clinical imaging of cartilage-part 1 : Technical aspects].

Authors:  C Glaser; A Heuck; A Horng
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Voxel-based reproducibility of T2 relaxation time in patellar cartilage at 1.5 T with a new validated 3D rigid registration algorithm.

Authors:  José G Raya; Annie Horng; Olaf Dietrich; Jürgen Weber; Julia Dinges; Elisabeth Mützel; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian Glaser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  How valid is the arthroscopic diagnosis of cartilage lesions? Results of an opinion survey among highly experienced arthroscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Gunter Spahn; H Michael Klinger; Gunther O Hofmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.