Literature DB >> 12956243

The nonindependence of stimulus properties in human category learning.

Bradley C Love1, Arthur B Markman.   

Abstract

Typically, models of category learning are verified through behavioral experiments with stimuli consisting of putatively independent dimensions such as shape, size, and color. The assumption of independence is critical in both the design of behavioral experiments and the development of models and theories of learning. Using the standard classification learning paradigm and a common stimulus set, the present work demonstrates that the assumption of independence is unwarranted. Systematic relations span stimulus dimensions and govern learning performance. For example, shape is not independent of size and color, because humans quantify size and color over shape when shape is relevant to the categorization. This quantification is reflected in natural language use (e.g., "blue triangle" as opposed to "triangle and blue"). In this example, color and size are predicates and shape is the argument. Across four experiments, the difficulty of mastering a classification rule can be predicted by the number of predicates that must be unbound in order to free rule-relevant stimulus dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12956243     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning.

Authors:  J Feldman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification.

Authors:  Takashi Yamauchi; Bradley C Love; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  The multifaceted nature of unsupervised category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

Review 5.  Category use and category learning.

Authors:  Arthur B Markman; Brian H Ross
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  On cross-modal similarity: the perceptual structure of pitch, loudness, and brightness.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination.

Authors:  G R Lockhead
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-07

10.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love; Douglas L Medin; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  9 in total

1.  Beyond common features: the role of roles in determining similarity.

Authors:  Matt Jones; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Response times seen as decompression times in Boolean concept use.

Authors:  Joël Bradmetz; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-11-09

3.  Words can slow down category learning.

Authors:  Chandra L Brojde; Chelsea Porter; Eliana Colunga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

4.  Classification errors and response times over multiple distributed sessions as a function of category structure.

Authors:  Derek E Zeigler; Ronaldo Vigo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

5.  Determining transformation distance in similarity: Considerations for assessing representational changes a priori.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Jonathan R Rein; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Think Reason       Date:  2012-02-21

6.  REFRESH: A new approach to modeling dimensional biases in perceptual similarity and categorization.

Authors:  Adam N Sanborn; Katherine Heller; Joseph L Austerweil; Nick Chater
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Non-linguistic learning and aphasia: evidence from a paired associate and feedback-based task.

Authors:  Sofia Vallila-Rohter; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Induction with uncertain categories: When do people consider the category alternatives?

Authors:  Brett K Hayes; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

9.  Similarity-dissimilarity competition in disjunctive classification tasks.

Authors:  Fabien Mathy; Harry H Haladjian; Eric Laurent; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.