Literature DB >> 34516151

REFRESH: A new approach to modeling dimensional biases in perceptual similarity and categorization.

Adam N Sanborn1, Katherine Heller2, Joseph L Austerweil1, Nick Chater3.   

Abstract

Much categorization behavior can be explained by family resemblance: New items are classified by comparison with previously learned exemplars. However, categorization behavior also shows a variety of dimensional biases, where the underlying space has so-called "separable" dimensions: Ease of learning categories depends on how the stimuli align with the separable dimensions of the space. For example, if a set of objects of various sizes and colors can be accurately categorized using a single separable dimension (e.g., size), then category learning will be fast, while if the category is determined by both dimensions, learning will be slow. To capture these dimensional biases, almost all models of categorization supplement family resemblance with either rule-based systems or selective attention to separable dimensions. But these models do not explain how separable dimensions initially arise; they are presumed to be unexplained psychological primitives. We develop, instead, a pure family resemblance version of the Rational Model of Categorization (RMC), which we term the Rational Exclusively Family RESemblance Hierarchy (REFRESH), which does not presuppose any separable dimensions in the space of stimuli. REFRESH infers how the stimuli are clustered and uses a hierarchical prior to learn expectations about the variability of clusters across categories. We first demonstrate the dimensional alignment of natural-category features and then show how through a lifetime of categorization experience REFRESH will learn prior expectations that clusters of stimuli will align with separable dimensions. REFRESH captures the key dimensional biases and also explains their stimulus-dependence and how they are learned and develop. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34516151      PMCID: PMC8567459          DOI: 10.1037/rev0000310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  84 in total

1.  A rational model of the effects of distributional information on feature learning.

Authors:  Joseph L Austerweil; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Hierarchies in concept attainment.

Authors:  U NEISSER; P WEENE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-12

3.  Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Integrality/separability of stimulus dimensions and multidimensional generalization in pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04

5.  Toward a universal law of generalization.

Authors:  D M Ennis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Dimensional interactions and the structure of psychological space: the representation of hue, saturation, and brightness.

Authors:  B Burns; B E Shepp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-05

7.  Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination.

Authors:  R Goldstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06

8.  Holistic and analytic modes of processing: the multiple determinants of perceptual analysis.

Authors:  C F Foard; D G Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-03

9.  A nonparametric Bayesian framework for constructing flexible feature representations.

Authors:  Joseph L Austerweil; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Rules and exemplars in category learning.

Authors:  M A Erickson; J K Kruschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  REFRESH: A new approach to modeling dimensional biases in perceptual similarity and categorization.

Authors:  Adam N Sanborn; Katherine Heller; Joseph L Austerweil; Nick Chater
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 8.934

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.