Literature DB >> 11034652

Four-year follow-up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis using the Bagby and Kuslich lumbar fusion cage.

S D Kuslich1, G Danielson, J D Dowdle, J Sherman, B Fredrickson, H Yuan, S L Griffith.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter clinical trial of a lumbar interbody fusion cage with a minimum of 4 years' follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the early positive clinical results in fusions with lumbar cages, such as the Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cage, are maintained beyond 2 years. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Threaded cages have been used increasingly for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative intervertebral disc disease. Concerns about the long-term clinical outcomes of this procedure have been posed, particularly regarding bony fusion viability, revision rates, potential adjacent level disease, and late complications.
METHODS: The study cohort was a 196-patient subset from a prospective investigational device exemption. In addition to early postoperative examinations, these patients were examined biannually with a minimum of 4 years' follow-up. Patient outcome was assessed by a 6-point scale that evaluated pain relief, and functional improvement was determined by changes in activities of daily living. Fusion rates and return to work were determined. Complications and secondary operations were reported and categorized as non-device related or device related.
RESULTS: The patient cohort with 4-year follow-up represented 25.6% of the original study population eligible at that time. Overall, the largest percentage of pain relief and functional improvements occurred by 3 months, and these improvements were maintained at each follow-up. Overall fusion rate was 91.7% and 95. 1% at 2 and 4 years, respectively. In this cohort, 39.5% of patients were working or were able to work within 3 months of surgery. After 4 years, 62.7% of patients were gainfully employed or able to work. The late-occurring complication rate in this cohort was 13.8% (27/196). Complications necessitating a second operation occurred in 8.7% (17/196), whereas reoperations that were deemed device related were performed in 3.1% (6/196).
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the early positive benefits of interbody fusion cage procedures are maintained through 4 years with acceptably low morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11034652     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  43 in total

1.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery].

Authors:  F Kandziora; K J Schnake; C K Klostermann; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts.

Authors:  Alan L Williams; Matthew F Gornet; J Kenneth Burkus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  [Interbody metal implants ("cages") for lumbar fusion].

Authors:  G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio; R Scholz; K Seller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation.

Authors:  Alexander Abbushi; Mario Cabraja; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale; Christian Woiciechowsky; Stefan Nikolaus Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  [Revision strategies for ventral implant failure in the lumbar spine exemplified by stand-alone cages].

Authors:  T Tarhan; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

9.  Evaluation of the 96/4 PLDLLA polymer resorbable lumbar interbody cage in a long term animal model.

Authors:  Jean Y Lazennec; Abdallah Madi; Marc A Rousseau; Bernard Roger; Gérard Saillant
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Epidural lysis of adhesions and myeloscopy.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vijay Singh
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2002-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.