Literature DB >> 10647158

Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability.

J C Goh1, H K Wong, A Thambyah, C S Yu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical testing on functional spine units with posterior lumbar interbody fusion cage implants of progressively larger sizes.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of increasing cage size on the restoration of spine stability after total facetectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Bilateral insertion of cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion commonly involves facetectomy. To restore stability with no additional instrumentation, the cages must provide sufficient distraction of the vertebrae and adequate tension in the anulus. The size of cages is therefore an important consideration in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
METHODS: Eight human lumbar functional spine units were obtained and divided into two equal groups; one group underwent bending tests and the other twisting. The functional spinal units were tested intact, after total bilateral facetectomy and with three sets of cages that were progressively larger in size.
RESULTS: After facetectomy, the functional spine unit's stiffness reduced significantly from that of the intact spine in extension (48% of intact), lateral bending (25%), and torsion (39%). With the posterior insertion of small cages into the facetectomized functional spine units, only extension stiffness was restored to the intact level, whereas flexion stiffness reduced significantly (41% of intact). The medium cages restored the lateral bending stiffness of the facetectomized functional spine units; only the large cages managed to restore the torsional stiffness. Flexion stiffness of the facetectomized functional spine units with cages remained significantly less than that of the intact spine, regardless of cage size.
CONCLUSION: In the facetectomized lumbar spine unit, cage size influences lateral bending and torsional stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10647158     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200001010-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery].

Authors:  F Kandziora; K J Schnake; C K Klostermann; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Biodegradable cage. Osteointegration in spondylodesis of the sheep cervical spine].

Authors:  R Pflugmacher; T Eindorf; M Scholz; S Gumnior; C Krall; P Schleicher; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  The benefits of elective spinal implant removal: a retrospective study of 137 patients.

Authors:  Thorsten Jentzsch; Vinicius Gomes de Lima; Burkhardt Seifert; Kai Sprengel; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical study of a hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage.

Authors:  Yu-Tong Gu; Lian-Shun Jia; Tong-Yi Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation.

Authors:  Alexander Abbushi; Mario Cabraja; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale; Christian Woiciechowsky; Stefan Nikolaus Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  In vivo experimental study of hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage (HCIFC).

Authors:  Yu-tong Gu; Zhen-jun Yao; Lian-shun Jia; Jin Qi; Jun Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The use of BoneWelding® technology in spinal surgery: an experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  Dorothee Heidenreich; Jens D Langhoff; Katja Nuss; Katharina Kluge; Käthi Kämpf; Katalin Zlinsky; Monika Hilbe; Jörg Mayer; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Risk factors for cage subsidence and clinical outcomes after transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Tiago Amorim-Barbosa; Catarina Pereira; Diogo Catelas; Cláudia Rodrigues; Paulo Costa; Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto; Pedro Neves
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-31

10.  The use of beta-tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Ricarda Lechner; Michaela Gstöttner; Conrad Kobel; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.