Literature DB >> 12954407

Reinforcement value of sucrose measured by progressive ratio operant licking in the rat.

Anthony Sclafani1, Karen Ackroff.   

Abstract

Progressive ratio (PR) schedules, which require increasing numbers of responses for successive reinforcements, are widely used to measure the reward value of foods, fluids, and drugs in operant lever-pressing tasks. The present study evaluated a PR operant licking task as a measure of sweet taste reward. In Experiment 1, food deprived rats were offered sucrose to drink on PR lick or fixed ratio (FR) lick schedules (30 min/day). In Experiment 2, nondeprived rats were offered sucrose to drink on PR or FR schedules and free access to water and food 23 h/day. In both experiments, the FR rats increased and then decreased their sucrose solution intake as concentration increased from 1% to 32% or 64%. The PR rats, in contrast, showed a near-linear increase in sucrose solution intake, lick rates, and break points (highest ratio completed) as a function of sucrose concentration. The PR rats drank less sucrose than did the FR rats although they emitted more total licks at the highest concentration tested. These results are similar to those reported with PR lever-pressing tasks. Thus, PR operant licking, which requires minimal training and equipment, is a useful alternate measure of fluid reward in rodents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12954407     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00143-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  46 in total

Review 1.  Do Food Preferences Change After Bariatric Surgery?

Authors:  Daniel Gero; Robert E Steinert; Carel W le Roux; Marco Bueter
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Cognitive and neuronal systems underlying obesity.

Authors:  Scott E Kanoski
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-01-12

3.  Reinforcing efficacy of fat, as assessed by progressive ratio responding, depends upon availability not amount consumed.

Authors:  F H E Wojnicki; R K Babbs; R L W Corwin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-03-16

4.  A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

Authors:  P S Hogenkamp; A Shechter; M-P St-Onge; A Sclafani; H R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-01-13

5.  The reinforcement enhancing effects of nicotine depend on the incentive value of non-drug reinforcers and increase with repeated drug injections.

Authors:  Matthew I Palmatier; Gina L Matteson; Jessica J Black; Xiu Liu; Anthony R Caggiula; Laure Craven; Eric C Donny; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 6.  Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; John J Leddy; Jennifer L Temple; Myles S Faith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Effect of reinforcer magnitude on performance maintained by progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J F Rickard; S Body; Z Zhang; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Venkata Anupama Narla; Karim Boudadi
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine decreases breakpoint of rats engaging in a progressive ratio licking task for sucrose and quinine solutions.

Authors:  Clare M Mathes; Jillian R Gregson; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Intermittent access to preferred food reduces the reinforcing efficacy of chow in rats.

Authors:  Pietro Cottone; Valentina Sabino; Luca Steardo; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.