Daniel Gero1, Robert E Steinert1, Carel W le Roux2,3, Marco Bueter4. 1. Department of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 2. Investigative Science, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK. 3. Diabetes Complications Research Centre, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 4. Department of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. marco.bueter@usz.ch.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Insights into physiological mechanisms responsible for weight loss after bariatric surgery (BS) have challenged the traditional view that mechanical restriction and caloric malabsorption are major drivers of weight loss and health benefits after BS. Altered diet selection with an increased postoperative preference for low-sugar and low-fat food has also been implicated as a potential mechanism beyond mere reduction of calorie intake. However, the empirical support for this phenomenon is not uniform and evidence is largely based on indirect measurements, such as self-reported food intake data, which are prone to inaccuracy due to their subjective character. RECENT FINDINGS: Most studies indicate that patients not only reduce their caloric intake after BS, but also show a reduced preference of food with high sugar and high fat content. So far, standard behavioral tests to directly measure changes in food intake behavior after BS have been mainly used in animal models. It remains unclear whether there are fundamental shifts in the palatability of high-fat and sugary foods after BS or simply a decrease in the appetitive drive to ingest them. Studies of appetitive behavior in humans after BS have produced equivocal results. Learning processes may play a role as changes in diet selection seem to progress with time after surgery. So far, direct measures of altered food selection in humans after BS are rare and the durability of altered food selection as well as the role of learning remains elusive.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Insights into physiological mechanisms responsible for weight loss after bariatric surgery (BS) have challenged the traditional view that mechanical restriction and caloric malabsorption are major drivers of weight loss and health benefits after BS. Altered diet selection with an increased postoperative preference for low-sugar and low-fat food has also been implicated as a potential mechanism beyond mere reduction of calorie intake. However, the empirical support for this phenomenon is not uniform and evidence is largely based on indirect measurements, such as self-reported food intake data, which are prone to inaccuracy due to their subjective character. RECENT FINDINGS: Most studies indicate that patients not only reduce their caloric intake after BS, but also show a reduced preference of food with high sugar and high fat content. So far, standard behavioral tests to directly measure changes in food intake behavior after BS have been mainly used in animal models. It remains unclear whether there are fundamental shifts in the palatability of high-fat and sugary foods after BS or simply a decrease in the appetitive drive to ingest them. Studies of appetitive behavior in humans after BS have produced equivocal results. Learning processes may play a role as changes in diet selection seem to progress with time after surgery. So far, direct measures of altered food selection in humans after BS are rare and the durability of altered food selection as well as the role of learning remains elusive.
Authors: Torsten Olbers; Sofia Björkman; Ak Lindroos; Almantas Maleckas; Lars Lönn; Lars Sjöström; Hans Lönroth Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Ali Aminian; Claire E Pothier; Esther S H Kim; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrew C Shin; Huiyuan Zheng; R Leigh Townsend; Laurel M Patterson; Gregory M Holmes; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: H E Wilson-Pérez; A P Chambers; D A Sandoval; M A Stefater; S C Woods; S C Benoit; R J Seeley Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Kellie M Hyde; Ginger D Blonde; Marco Bueter; Carel W le Roux; Alan C Spector Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Ginger D Blonde; Clare M Mathes; Tadashi Inui; Elizabeth A Hamel; Ruth K Price; M Barbara E Livingstone; Carel W Le Roux; Alan C Spector Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 3.619