Literature DB >> 12948604

Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects.

C de Balthasar1, C Boëx, G Cosendai, G Valentini, A Sigrist, M Pelizzone.   

Abstract

Channel interactions were assessed using high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant subjects using the Ineraid electrode array. Stimulation currents were applied on one intracochlear electrode and their effects on psychophysical detection thresholds on an adjacent electrode were measured. Stimuli were trains of brief, biphasic, 50-micros/phase pulses presented at a rate of 2000 pulses per second per channel. In experiment I, we studied how the detection of a probe signal was influenced by a sub-threshold perturbation signal presented either simultaneously or non-simultaneously (with no overlap) on an adjacent electrode. Results showed that simultaneous activation led to strong channel interactions, producing threshold changes consistent with instantaneous electric field summation. Non-simultaneous activation revealed much weaker interactions, producing threshold changes of opposite sign. In experiment II, we studied how the temporal delay between perturbation and probe pulses, as well as how the level of the perturbation signal influenced non-simultaneous channel interactions. First, threshold changes when reversing the polarity of the perturbation did progressively vanish when increasing the delay between pulses. This suggested that non-overlapping stimulation of adjacent electrodes produced channel interactions that were in part due to residual polarization of the nerve membrane. Second, increasing the perturbation to supra-threshold levels produced threshold elevations that were independent of the interpulse interval. This suggested channel interactions due to neural masking. These results provide insights into the different concurrently active mechanisms of channel interactions in cochlear implant systems using this type of stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12948604     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00174-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

1.  Temporal interactions during paired-electrode stimulation in two retinal prosthesis subjects.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Robert J Greenberg; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  Current-level discrimination in the context of interleaved, multichannel stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of number of stimulated electrodes, pulse rate, and electrode separation.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-21

4.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of polarity order and electrode-activation order on loudness in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants?

Authors:  Pieter J Venter; Johan J Hanekom
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-19

9.  Calcium activation of cortical neurons by continuous electrical stimulation: Frequency dependence, temporal fidelity, and activation density.

Authors:  Nicholas J Michelson; James R Eles; Alberto L Vazquez; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Psychophysical and physiological measures of electrical-field interaction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.