Literature DB >> 12945072

Randomized clinical trial of suction versus standard clearance of the diathermy plume.

S H Pillinger1, L Delbridge, D R Lewis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diathermy smoke contains complex hydrocarbons and organic material, and may contain viable tumour cells or viral particles. These particles measure from 0.05 to more than 25 microm, and long-term exposure to such particles may have adverse effects on health. This study investigated whether a suction clearance device reduces the amount of smoke reaching the surgeon's mask.
METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial in which subjects were randomized to standard diathermy equipment (group 1) or a diathermy smoke extraction system (group 2). All patients underwent thyroid or parathyroid surgery with standard anterior cervical collar incision and division of the strap muscles. The difference in the amount of smoke reaching the level of the operator's mask was measured by means of an aerosol monitor.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients were randomized to each group. The mean amount of smoke detected at the level of the operator's mask was 0.137 mg/m(3) in group 1 and 0.012 mg/m(3) in group 2 (P < 0.001). The maximum amount detected was 2.411 and 0.255 mg/m(3) respectively (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of incision time or background particles measured before and after surgery. There was no correlation between gland weight and incision time or amount of smoke detected.
CONCLUSION: Suction clearance of the diathermy plume resulted in a significant reduction in the amount of smoke reaching the level of the operator's mask. Although the risk of diathermy smoke inhalation is currently unknown, use of such a system appears advisable. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12945072     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  12 in total

Review 1.  Current attitudes and practices towards diathermy smoke.

Authors:  John Spearman; George Tsavellas; Paul Nichols
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study.

Authors:  Taekhee Lee; Jhy-Charm Soo; Ryan F LeBouf; Dru Burns; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Michael Kashon; Jay Bowers; Martin Harper
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Barry N Swerdlow
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  James Ansell; Neil Warren; Pete Wall; Kim Cocks; Stuart Goddard; Richard Whiston; Michael Stechman; David Scott-Coombes; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery.

Authors:  O S Al Sahaf; I Vega-Carrascal; F O Cunningham; J P McGrath; F J Bloomfield
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Effect of Electrocautery Settings on Particulate Concentrations in Surgical Plume during Tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Michele M Carr; Vijay A Patel; Jhy-Charm Soo; Sherri Friend; Eun Gyung Lee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 7.  Complications, Implications, and Prevention of Electrosurgical Injuries: Corner Stone of Diathermy Use for Junior Surgical Trainees.

Authors:  Manjunath Siddaiah-Subramanya; Kor Woi Tiang; Masimba Nyandowe
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2017-09-14

Review 8.  It is time for a more cautious approach to surgical diathermy, especially in COVID-19 outbreak: A schematic review.

Authors:  Raju Karuppal; Sibin Surendran; Gopinathan Patinharayil; V V Muhammed Fazil; Anwar Marthya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-16

9.  The characterization of surgical smoke from various tissues and its implications for occupational safety.

Authors:  Markus Karjalainen; Anton Kontunen; Sampo Saari; Topi Rönkkö; Jukka Lekkala; Antti Roine; Niku Oksala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Electrocautery, Diathermy, and Surgical Energy Devices: Are Surgical Teams at Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Kimberley Zakka; Simon Erridge; Swathikan Chidambaram; Michael Kynoch; James Kinross; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.