Literature DB >> 32228131

Effect of Electrocautery Settings on Particulate Concentrations in Surgical Plume during Tonsillectomy.

Michele M Carr1, Vijay A Patel2, Jhy-Charm Soo3, Sherri Friend3, Eun Gyung Lee3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the effect of monopolar electrocautery (EC) settings on surgical plume particulate concentration during pediatric tonsillectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Tertiary medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: During total tonsillectomy exclusively performed with EC, air was sampled with a surgeon-worn portable particle counter. The airborne mean and maximum particle concentrations were compared for tonsillectomy performed with EC at 12 W vs 20 W, with smoke evacuation system (SES) and no smoke evacuation (NS).
RESULTS: A total of 36 children were included in this analysis: 9 cases with EC at 12 W and SES (12SES), 9 cases with EC at 20 W and SES (20SES), 9 cases with EC at 12 W without SES (12NS), and 9 cases with EC at 20 W without SES (20NS). Mean particle number concentration in the breathing zone during tonsillectomy was 1661 particles/cm3 for 12SES, 5515 particles/cm3 for 20SES, 8208 particles/cm3 for 12NS, and 78,506 particles/cm3 for 20NS. There was a statistically significant difference in the particle number concentrations among the 4 groups. The correlation between the particle number concentration and EC time was either moderate (for 12SES) or negative (for remaining groups).
CONCLUSION: Airborne particle concentrations during tonsillectomy are over 9.5 times higher when EC is set at 20 W vs 12 W with NS, which is mitigated to 3.3 times with SES. Applying lower EC settings with SES during pediatric tonsillectomy significantly reduces surgical plume exposure for patients, surgeons, and operating room personnel, which is a well-known occupational health hazard.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrocautery; pediatric otolaryngology; surgical plume; tonsillectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32228131      PMCID: PMC7323892          DOI: 10.1177/0194599820914275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  23 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of suction versus standard clearance of the diathermy plume.

Authors:  S H Pillinger; L Delbridge; D R Lewis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Chemical composition of gases surgeons are exposed to during endoscopic urological resections.

Authors:  Robin Weston; Richard N Stephenson; Paul W Kutarski; Nigel J Parr
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Guideline Summary: Surgical Smoke Safety.

Authors: 
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.676

4.  The mutagenicity of electrocautery smoke.

Authors:  J E Gatti; C J Bryant; R B Noone; J B Murphy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Indications for tonsillectomy: a 10 year retrospective review.

Authors:  Hetal Harish Patel; Chelsey E Straight; Erik B Lehman; Michelle Tanner; Michele M Carr
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: detection and protection.

Authors:  W S Sawchuk; P J Weber; D R Lowy; L M Dzubow
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 7.  Surgical smoke: a review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air?

Authors:  W L Barrett; S M Garber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laser smoke effect on the bronchial system.

Authors:  L Freitag; G A Chapman; M Sielczak; A Ahmed; D Russin
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Electrosurgical Smoke: Ultrafine Particle Measurements and Work Environment Quality in Different Operating Theatres.

Authors:  Francesco Romano; Jan Gustén; Stefano De Antonellis; Cesare M Joppolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Surgical mask filter and fit performance.

Authors:  Tara Oberg; Lisa M Brosseau
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.918

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the therapeutic effects of coblation tonsillectomy versus electrocautery tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Fu-Guo Cai; Wei Hong; Yu Ye; Ye-Song Liu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

Review 2.  Diagnostic and surgical innovations in otolaryngology for adult and paediatric patients during the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Paolo Petrone; Emanuela Birocchi; Cesare Miani; Roberta Anzivino; Pasqua Irene Sciancalepore; Antonio Di Mauro; Paolo Dalena; Cosimo Russo; Vincenzo De Ceglie; Maurizio Masciavè; Maria Luisa Fiorella
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.618

Review 3.  Innovations in otorhinolaryngology in the age of COVID-19: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  E Berryhill McCarty; Liuba Soldatova; Jason A Brant; Jason G Newman
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-01-22

4.  COVID-19 infection in the palatine tonsil tissue and detritus: the detection of the virus compartment with RT-PCR.

Authors:  Hamsu Kadriyan; Bayu Tirta Dirja; Dewi Suryani; Didit Yudhanto
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-05

Review 5.  CSO (Canadian Society of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery) position paper on rhinologic and skull base surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yvonne Chan; Sarfaraz M Banglawala; Christopher J Chin; David W J Côté; Dustin Dalgorf; John R de Almeida; Martin Desrosiers; Richard M Gall; Artur Gevorgyan; A Hassan Hassan; Arif Janjua; John M Lee; Randy M Leung; Bradford D Mechor; Dominik Mertz; Eric Monteiro; Smriti Nayan; Brian Rotenberg; John Scott; Kristine A Smith; Doron D Sommer; Leigh Sowerby; Marc A Tewfik; Andrew Thamboo; Allan Vescan; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-12-03

Review 6.  Adenotonsillectomy in high risk patients: Hematologic abnormalities and COVID-19 considerations.

Authors:  Ryan Ruiz; Kavita Dedhia
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-05-29

Review 7.  Clinical evidence based review and recommendations of aerosol generating medical procedures in otolaryngology - head and neck surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Andrew Thamboo; Jane Lea; Doron D Sommer; Leigh Sowerby; Arman Abdalkhani; Christopher Diamond; Jennifer Ham; Austin Heffernan; M Cai Long; Jobanjit Phulka; Yu Qi Wu; Phillip Yeung; Marc Lammers
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 8.  Surgical plume in dermatology: an insidious and often overlooked hazard.

Authors:  T Searle; F R Ali; F Al-Niaimi
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.