Literature DB >> 29283318

Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study.

Taekhee Lee1, Jhy-Charm Soo1, Ryan F LeBouf2, Dru Burns2, Diane Schwegler-Berry3, Michael Kashon4, Jay Bowers5, Martin Harper1.   

Abstract

This experimental study aimed to evaluate airborne particulates and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from surgical smoke when a local exhaust ventilation (LEV) system is in place. Surgical smoke was generated from human tissue in an unoccupied operating room using an electrocautery surgical device for 15 min with 3 different test settings: (1) without LEV control; (2) control with a wall irrigation suction unit with an in-line ultra-low penetration air filter; and (3) control with a smoke evacuation system. Flow rate of LEVs was approximately 35 L/min and suction was maintained within 5 cm of electrocautery interaction site. A total of 6 experiments were conducted. Particle number and mass concentrations were measured using direct reading instruments including a condensation particle counter (CPC), a light-scattering laser photometer (DustTrak DRX), a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS), an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS), and a viable particle counter. Selected VOCs were collected using evacuated canisters using grab, personal and area sampling techniques. The largest average particle and VOCs concentrations were found in the absence of LEV control followed by LEV controls. Average ratios of LEV controls to without LEV control ranged 0.24-0.33 (CPC), 0.28-0.39 (SMPS), 0.14-0.31 (DustTrak DRX), and 0.26-0.55 (APS). Ethanol and isopropyl alcohol were dominant in the canister samples. Acetaldehyde, acetone, acetonitrile, benzene, hexane, styrene, and toluene were detected but at lower concentrations (<500 μg/m3) and concentrations of the VOCs were much less than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommended exposure limit values. Utilization of the LEVs for surgical smoke control can significantly reduce but not completely eliminate airborne particles and VOCs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrocautery; healthcare workers; local exhaust ventilation; surgical smoke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29283318      PMCID: PMC6460469          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1422082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  26 in total

Review 1.  An assessment of the occupational hazards related to medical lasers.

Authors:  Jennifer S Pierce; Steven E Lacey; Julia F Lippert; Ramon Lopez; John E Franke; Michael D Colvard
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 2.  Surgical smoke.

Authors:  Rachelle Springer
Journal:  Plast Surg Nurs       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec

3.  Randomized clinical trial of suction versus standard clearance of the diathermy plume.

Authors:  S H Pillinger; L Delbridge; D R Lewis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Laser-generated air contaminants from medical laser applications: a state-of-the-science review of exposure characterization, health effects, and control.

Authors:  Jennifer S Pierce; Steven E Lacey; Julia F Lippert; Ramon Lopez; John E Franke
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  The effects of laser smoke on the lungs of rats.

Authors:  M S Baggish; M Elbakry
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  [Respiratory symptoms caused by the use of electrocautery in physicians being trained in surgery in a Mexican hospital].

Authors:  María Cristina Navarro-Meza; Raquel González-Baltazar; María Guadalupe Aldrete-Rodríguez; David Enrique Carmona-Navarro; María Guadalupe López-Cardona
Journal:  Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica       Date:  2013-03

7.  Evaluation of a smoke evacuator used for laser surgery.

Authors:  J P Smith; C E Moss; C J Bryant; A K Fleeger
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Exposure to volatile organic compounds in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Ryan F LeBouf; M Abbas Virji; Rena Saito; Paul K Henneberger; Nancy Simcox; Aleksandr B Stefaniak
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Performance of Facepiece Respirators and Surgical Masks Against Surgical Smoke: Simulated Workplace Protection Factor Study.

Authors:  Shuang Gao; Richard H Koehler; Michael Yermakov; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2016-02-28

10.  Electrocautery Devices With Feedback Mode and Teflon-Coated Blades Create Less Surgical Smoke for a Quality Improvement in the Operating Theater.

Authors:  Tobias Kisch; Eirini Liodaki; Robert Kraemer; Peter Mailaender; Matthias Brandenburger; Veronika Hellwig; Felix H Stang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  12 in total

1.  Surgical Team Exposure to Cautery Smoke and Its Mitigation during Tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Daniel C O'Brien; Eun Gyung Lee; Jhy-Charm Soo; Sherri Friend; Sarah Callaham; Michele M Carr
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Highlighting the Concepts of Local Exhaust Ventilation in Negative-Pressure Rooms.

Authors:  Chia-Lung Kao; Ming-Yuan Hong; Chih-Hsien Chi
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Occupational Hazards of Surgical Smoke and Achieving a Smoke Free Operating Room Environment: Asia-Pacific Consensus Statement on Practice Recommendations.

Authors:  Anil Ashok Heroor; Belal Bin Asaf; Suryanarayana S V Deo; Eric Hui-Lun Lau; Chi Wei Mok; Peter Joseph DiPasco; Pradeep Jain; Utpal Anand
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 4.  Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Barry N Swerdlow
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Effect of Electrocautery Settings on Particulate Concentrations in Surgical Plume during Tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Michele M Carr; Vijay A Patel; Jhy-Charm Soo; Sherri Friend; Eun Gyung Lee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Prospective randomized study evaluating the usefulness of a surgical smoke evacuation system in operating rooms for breast surgery.

Authors:  Yutaka Tokuda; Takuho Okamura; Miki Maruta; Mutsuko Orita; Miyuki Noguchi; Toshiyasu Suzuki; Hideaki Matsuki
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.646

7.  A study to quantify surgical plume and survey the efficiency of different local exhaust ventilations.

Authors:  Ping-Chia Cheng; Ming-Hsun Wen; Wan-Lun Hsu; Po-Wen Cheng; Li-Jen Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  In vitro toxicological evaluation of surgical smoke from human tissue.

Authors:  Jennifer D Sisler; Justine Shaffer; Jhy-Charm Soo; Ryan F LeBouf; Martin Harper; Yong Qian; Taekhee Lee
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.646

9.  Comparison of Surgical Smoke Generated During Electrosurgery with Aerosolized Particulates from Ultrasonic and High-Speed Cutting.

Authors:  Vincent J Casey; Cian Martin; Peter Curtin; Kevin Buckley; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Surgical Smoke-Hazard Perceptions and Protective Measures in German Operating Rooms.

Authors:  Martina Michaelis; Felix Martin Hofmann; Albert Nienhaus; Udo Eickmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.