Literature DB >> 24570011

Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study.

James Ansell1, Neil Warren, Pete Wall, Kim Cocks, Stuart Goddard, Richard Whiston, Michael Stechman, David Scott-Coombes, Jared Torkington.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultravision™ is a new device that utilizes electrostatic precipitation to clear surgical smoke. The aim was to evaluate its performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into "active (device on)" or "control (device off)." Three operating surgeons scored the percentage effective visibility and three reviewers scored the percentage of the procedure where smoke was present. All assessors also used a 5-point scale (1 = imperceptible/excellent and 5 = very annoying/bad) to rate visual impairment. Secondary outcomes were the number of smoke-related pauses, camera cleaning, and pneumoperitoneum reductions. Mean results are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: In 30 patients (active 13, control 17), the effective visibility was 89.2% (83.3-95.0) for active cases and 71.2% (65.7-76.7) for controls. The proportion of the procedure where smoke was present was 41.1% (33.8-48.3) for active cases and 61.5% (49.0-74.1) for controls. Operating surgeons rated the visual impairment as 2.2 (1.7-2.6) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8-3.5) for controls. Reviewers rated the visual impairment as 2.3 (2.0-2.5) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8-3.7) for controls. In the active group, 23% of procedures were paused to allow smoke clearance compared to 94% of control cases. Camera cleaning was not needed in 85% of active procedures and 35% of controls. The pneumoperitoneum was reduced in 0% of active cases and 88% of controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultravision™ improves visibility during laparoscopic surgery and reduces delays in surgery for smoke clearance and camera cleaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570011     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3427-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic lens fogging: a review of etiology and methods to maintain a clear visual field.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Neil E Fleshner; Damien M Bolton
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Production and systemic absorption of toxic byproducts of tissue combustion during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J S Wu; D R Luttmann; T A Meininger; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Current attitudes and practices towards diathermy smoke.

Authors:  John Spearman; George Tsavellas; Paul Nichols
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Randomized clinical trial of suction versus standard clearance of the diathermy plume.

Authors:  S H Pillinger; L Delbridge; D R Lewis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Laparoscopy and adhesion formation, adhesions and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas E Ott
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.303

6.  Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris.

Authors:  P J Capizzi; R P Clay; M J Battey
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 7.  Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas Mowbray; James Ansell; Neil Warren; Pete Wall; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The mutagenicity of electrocautery smoke.

Authors:  J E Gatti; C J Bryant; R B Noone; J B Murphy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: detection and protection.

Authors:  W S Sawchuk; P J Weber; D R Lowy; L M Dzubow
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Smoke in the operating theater: an unregarded source of danger.

Authors:  Ralph Hollmann; Christian E Hort; Erich Kammer; Markus Naegele; Markus W Sigrist; Claudia Meuli-Simmen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  4 in total

1.  Establishment of a rat ovarian peritoneal metastasis model to study pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).

Authors:  Leen Van de Sande; Wouter Willaert; Sarah Cosyns; Kaat De Clercq; Molood Shariati; Katrien Remaut; Wim Ceelen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 2.  Overcoming Drug Resistance by Taking Advantage of Physical Principles: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC).

Authors:  Giorgi Nadiradze; Philipp Horvath; Yaroslav Sautkin; Rami Archid; Frank-Jürgen Weinreich; Alfred Königsrainer; Marc A Reymond
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  In Vivo Feasibility of Electrostatic Precipitation as an Adjunct to Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC).

Authors:  Tinatin Kakchekeeva; Cedric Demtröder; Nirmitha I Herath; Dominic Griffiths; Jared Torkington; Wiebke Solaß; Marie Dutreix; Marc A Reymond
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Electrostatic Precipitation in Low Pressure Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.

Authors:  David Levine; Gregory F Petroski; Tracy Haertling; Teresa Beaudoin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.