Literature DB >> 32296937

Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Barry N Swerdlow1.   

Abstract

Surgical smoke generated by use of electrosurgical units (ESUs), lasers, and ultrasonic scalpels constitutes a physical, chemical, and biological hazard for anesthesia personnel. Inhalation of particulate matter with inflammatory consequences, pulmonary injury from products of tissue pyrolysis, exposure to mutagens and carcinogens, and the transmission of human papillomavirus (HPV) and possibly other pathogens represent a spectrum of adverse effects associated with the occupational exposure to surgical plume. While adequate operating room ventilation and use of high filtration-efficiency masks offer some protection from these conditions, the most effective method of safeguarding against surgical smoke involves its removal with a dedicated smoke evacuation device (SED). Despite the fact that many professional and governmental agencies have endorsed widespread usage of SEDs, anesthesia providers have been largely silent on this subject, with few reports within the field of anesthesiology and perioperative medicine regarding these hazards. SED use is relatively infrequent in most surgeries, and this condition reflects surgeons' reluctance to employ these devices, likely resulting from lack of education and less than optimal technology. Anesthesia societies and academic centers can serve critical roles in advocating employment of SEDs in much the same way that they have supported perioperative smoking cessation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hazards; Smoke evacuation; Surgical smoke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32296937     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-020-02775-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  74 in total

Review 1.  Update for nurse anesthetists. Patr 1. The hazards of surgical smoke.

Authors:  K Ball
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  2001-04

2.  Surgical smoke - a health hazard in the operating theatre: a study to quantify exposure and a survey of the use of smoke extractor systems in UK plastic surgery units.

Authors:  D S Hill; J K O'Neill; R J Powell; D W Oliver
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Feasibility of tobacco interventions in anesthesiology practices: a pilot study.

Authors:  David O Warner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Perioperative tobacco interventions by Chinese anesthesiologists: practices and attitudes.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Chunhua Yu; Ailun Luo; Yuguang Huang; David O Warner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The role of anesthesiologists in promoting smoking cessation.

Authors:  John Oyston
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  Surgical Smoke Exposure in Operating Room Personnel: A Review.

Authors:  Ice V Limchantra; Yuman Fong; Kurt A Melstrom
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Surgical Smoke: Putting the Pieces Together to Become Smoke-Free: 1.6 www.aornjournal.org/content/cme.

Authors:  Kim York; Mandy Autry
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.676

Review 8.  Perioperative tobacco use treatments: putting them into practice.

Authors:  Margaret B Nolan; David O Warner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-09-06

Review 9.  Surgical smoke: a review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air?

Authors:  W L Barrett; S M Garber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Tobacco control for anesthesiologists.

Authors:  David O Warner
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.