Literature DB >> 11003420

Lumbar spine radiology: analysis of the posteroanterior projection.

P C Brennan1, E Madigan.   

Abstract

The use of the posteroanterior (PA) technique as a means of dose reduction has been used effectively in radiology departments for chest and abdominal examinations. The aim of this investigation was to establish if the PA lumbar spine projection offers any advantages over the traditional anteroposterior (AP) view in terms of radiation dose and image quality. The contribution of tissue displacement to any dose reduction was also evaluated. The first part of the study involved the use of an anthropological phantom where entrance surface and an internal dose were measured for both the PA and AP projections. Entrance surface doses for both projections were then measured on randomly allocated female patients. Resultant image quality was assessed using CEC quality criteria. Anterior to posterior patient diameter was also recorded. The results demonstrated that with the PA compared with the AP projection, reductions of 38.6% (p = 0.016) and 38.9% (p = 0.02) in patient entrance surface dose and internal phantom dose, respectively. No significant differences in image quality were noted between the two projections. Patient diameter decreased by 1.8 cm with the PA view. The authors conclude that tissue displacement is the main factor for the patient dose reduction and recommend employment of the PA procedure for routine lumbar spine examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11003420     DOI: 10.1007/s003309900272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  6 in total

1.  Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool?

Authors:  P Doherty; D O'Leary; P C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Lumbar spine radiographs - is it time for widespread adoption of posteroanterior projection?

Authors:  Christopher Green; Guru Karnati; Katharine Thomson; Ashok Subramanian
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Reduction of radiation risks in patients undergoing some X-ray examinations by using optimal projections: A Monte Carlo program-based mathematical calculation.

Authors:  A Chaparian; A Kanani; M Baghbanian
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-01

4.  Comparison of anteroposterior and posteroanterior projection in lumbar spine radiography.

Authors:  Erna Alukic; Damijan Skrk; Nejc Mekis
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  The effect of breast shielding during lumbar spine radiography.

Authors:  Nejc Mekis; Dejan Zontar; Damijan Skrk
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  New patient-controlled abdominal compression method in radiography: radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Oili Piippo-Huotari; Eva Norrman; Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson; Håkan Geijer
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2018-05-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.