Literature DB >> 32495517

An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.

Nicole E Peacock1,2, Adam L Steward1, Peter J Riley2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High kVp techniques, 15% or 10-kVp rules, are well-known dose reduction methods. Traditionally, the use of high tube potential (i.e. increased kVp) is associated with decreased radiographic contrast and overall image quality. Recent studies suggest contrast and image quality are not heavily reliant on kVp with digital systems. This study aims to assess the effects of the high tube potential technique on clinical radiographic image quality when using digital systems, to validate high kVp as a dose saving technique.
METHODS: A selection of comparable pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs were collected from the hospital's picture archiving and communication system (PACS), with technical factors recorded. All clinical radiographs were assessed by 5 senior radiographers using a 15-point visual grading analysis (VGA) rubric.
RESULTS: For 40 AP pelvis radiographs and 40 lateral lumbar spine radiographs, reduction in the dose area product (DAP) with higher kVp is seen. Average pelvis DAP at 75 kVp = 14.06 mGy.cm2 ; 85 kVp = 7.47 mGy.cm2 . Average lumbar spine DAP at 80 kVp = 15.76 mGy.cm2 ; 90 kVp = 14.83 mGy.cm2 . Image quality and contrast scores showed no statistically significant difference between the high and low kVp groups (z = 0.06 and 0.12, respectively). Average pelvis VGA score at 75 kVp = 11.26; 85 kVp = 12.55. Average lumbar spine VGA score at 80 kVp = 9.23; 90 kVp = 10.64.
CONCLUSIONS: The high tube potential techniques allowed for reduced patient radiation doses whilst showing no degradation of diagnostic image quality in a clinical setting. This study successfully validates the high kVp technique as a useful tool for reducing patient radiation doses whilst maintaining high diagnostic image quality for digital pelvis and lumbar spine radiography.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiation Dosage; Radiation Ionising; Radiographic Image Enhancement; Radiographic Image Quality; Radiography; X-Rays; kVp

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32495517      PMCID: PMC7753839          DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci        ISSN: 2051-3895


  14 in total

1.  Optimizing the tube potential for lumbar spine radiography with a flat-panel digital detector.

Authors:  H Geijer; E Norrman; J Persliden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool?

Authors:  P Doherty; D O'Leary; P C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.

Authors:  Terri L Fauber; Timmerie F Cohen; Melanie C Dempsey
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

4.  Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.

Authors:  Chie Kuwahara; Takatoshi Aoki; Nobuhiro Oda; Jun Kawabata; Koichiro Sugimoto; Michiko Kobayashi; Masami Fujii; Yukunori Korogi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Examining Practitioners' Assessments of Perceived Aesthetic and Diagnostic Quality of High kVp-Low mAs Pelvis, Chest, Skull, and Hand Phantom Radiographs.

Authors:  Jenna R Lorusso; Lyndsay Fitzgeorge; Daniel Lorusso; Elizabeth Lorusso
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-06

6.  A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR.

Authors:  M C Shanahan
Journal:  Radiography (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-08

7.  Conventional Film-Screen Principles of Exposure Selection in the Digital Age.

Authors:  Adam Steward; Michael Tarollo; Giovanni Mandarano; Carla Lombardi
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2018-05

8.  Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.

Authors:  Martin Uffmann; Ulrich Neitzel; Mathias Prokop; Nahla Kabalan; Michael Weber; Christian J Herold; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Copper Filtration and kVp: Effect on Entrance Skin Exposure.

Authors:  James Barba; Melissa Culp
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review.

Authors:  William Ching; John Robinson; Mark McEntee
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.