Literature DB >> 12934221

Dislocation after polyethylene liner exchange in total hip arthroplasty.

Henry R Boucher1, Chris Lynch, Anthony M Young, C Anderson Engh, Charles Engh.   

Abstract

Little has been published on the outcomes of polyethylene liner exchanges for wear or osteolysis. We assessed 24 patients from our clinic who had an isolated polyethylene liner exchange for wear or osteolysis with retention of the acetabular shell and femoral stem. At a mean 56-month follow-up time, 6 hips (25%) had dislocated. Of these, 2 underwent repeat surgery for recurrent dislocation; 1 had 3 dislocations; 1 had 2 dislocations; and 2 had single dislocations. Seventeen of the remaining patients answered our questionnaire: 13 recovered faster from the polyethylene liner exchange than from the primary arthroplasty; 4 believed that their hips were not as stable, 4 believed the hip did not function as well; and 1 underwent revision for cup loosening. We conclude that polyethylene liner exchanges, with or without femoral head exchange for wear or osteolysis, are associated with a high risk of dislocation and possible decrease in function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12934221     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00266-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  Constrained cups appear incapable of meeting the demands of revision THA.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Salim K Durrani; Molly M Usrey; Kenneth B Mathis; Nikolaos V Bardakos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The fate of grafting acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Ryan M Nunley; Kirk E Smith; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  The surgical options and clinical evidence for treatment of wear or corrosion occurring with THA or TKA.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Henry Ho; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A three-dimensional method for evaluating changes in acetabular osteolytic lesions in response to treatment.

Authors:  Hiroshi Egawa; Henry Ho; Cathy Huynh; Robert H Hopper; C Anderson Engh; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H John Cooper; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Matthew Tetreault; Wayne G Paprosky; Scott M Sporer; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Isolated polyethylene exchange versus acetabular revision for polyethylene wear.

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; Elie Ghanem; Carrie Houssock; Mathew Austin; Javad Parvizi; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The Survival of Well-Fixed Cementless Femoral Component After Isolated Acetabular Component Revision.

Authors:  Mehmet Ekinci; Yucel Bilgin; Yasin Sayar; Omer Naci Ergin; Ahmet Salduz; Turgut Akgul; Irfan Ozturk
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  An unusual presentation of catastrophic failure of hip arthroplasty with a thigh mass.

Authors:  Florian Dibra; Hari Parvataneni
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-04-08

10.  Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.