Literature DB >> 33133412

The Survival of Well-Fixed Cementless Femoral Component After Isolated Acetabular Component Revision.

Mehmet Ekinci1, Yucel Bilgin1, Yasin Sayar1, Omer Naci Ergin1, Ahmet Salduz1, Turgut Akgul1, Irfan Ozturk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether isolated acetabular component revision or both component revision surgeries should be performed in patients with stable femoral component. The present study aimed to evaluate the survival of patients with unrevised stable uncemented femoral stem who underwent isolated acetabular component revision.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients who underwent isolated acetabular component revision and had stable uncemented femoral component during revision hip arthroplasty between February 1998 and December 2009. Demographic data of the patients included age, previous surgery, complications, duration between primary and revision surgery, and duration between revision and latest follow-up. Functional results were analyzed using Harris Hip Score (HHS).
RESULTS: Fifteen hips of thirteen patients were included in the study with a mean age of 62.08 ± 12.9 years. Average time from THA to the isolated acetabular revision was 9.2 ± 3.48 years. Average follow-up time from revision to the latest follow-up was 12.39 ± 2.68 years, and femoral components had been followed for an average of 21.6 ± 4.06 years since the time of implantation. Average HHS of the patients were 53 before revision surgery and 81.9 at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). The 10-year survival rate of patients who underwent revision in the femoral component was 100%, whereas their 15-year survival rate was 93.3%. None of the acetabular components required revision.
CONCLUSION: Isolated revision of acetabular component may be considered if there is stable uncemented femoral component in revision THA. Acetabular reconstruction quality, acetabular and unrevised femoral component survival are not affected by retaining well-fixed femoral component. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4, retrospective cohort study. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral stem survival; Isolated acetabular component; Revision hip arthroplasty; Unrevised femoral component

Year:  2020        PMID: 33133412      PMCID: PMC7572985          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00147-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  28 in total

1.  Revision of an acetabular liner has a high risk of dislocation.

Authors:  A W Blom; L Astle; J Loveridge; I D Learmonth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-12

2.  Acetabulum-Only Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Good Functional Outcomes and Survivorship.

Authors:  Jun Wei Lim; David Ridley; Linda R Johnston; Benedict A Clift
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Revision of the acetabular component without cement. A concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-four years, of a previous report.

Authors:  Daniel K Park; Craig J Della Valle; Laura Quigley; Mario Moric; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Isolated acetabular revision hip arthroplasty with the use of uncemented cup.

Authors:  Yee-Suk Kim; Young-Ho Kim; Kyu-Tae Hwang; Il-Yong Choi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  A technique of revision of failed acetabular components leaving the femoral component in situ.

Authors:  M J Neil; M I Solomon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  A comparative study of the posterolateral and anterolateral approaches for isolated acetabular revision.

Authors:  Youn-Soo Park; Young-Wan Moon; Byung-Ho Lim; Min-Soo Shon; Seung-Jae Lim
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components.

Authors:  C A Engh; P Massin; K E Suthers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Results of isolated acetabular revisions: the fate of the unrevised femoral component.

Authors:  E D Poon; P F Lachiewicz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Factors influencing the longer-term survival of uncemented acetabular components used in total hip revisions.

Authors:  Carroll P Jones; Paul F Lachiewicz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.