Literature DB >> 12921415

A phoneme-grapheme feedback consistency effect.

Conrad Perry1.   

Abstract

Recent studies examining the feedback consistency effect have been criticized for poor item selection (Peereman, Content, & Bonin, 1998). In the present study, an experiment was run with a new set of items, in which feedback consistency was manipulated at a phoneme-grapheme level. The results suggested that participants responded faster to feedback-consistent words than to feedback-inconsistent words. This was despite the feedback-consistent and feedback-inconsistent word groups' being matched on many other dimensions, including word frequency and subjective orthographic frequency. These results may differ from those of previous studies, since previous studies in English have measured feedback consistency at the rime-body level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12921415     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?

Authors:  P M Pexman; S J Lupker
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1999-12

Review 4.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

Authors:  M Coltheart; K Rastle; C Perry; R Langdon; J Ziegler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models.

Authors:  J C Ziegler; A M Jacobs; D Klüppel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency.

Authors:  Conrad Perry; Johannes C Ziegler; Max Coltheart
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-07

7.  Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly.

Authors:  I Berent
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; J C Johnston; B L Hale
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.051

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Individual Differences in Phonological Feedback Effects: Evidence for the Orthographic Recoding Hypothesis of Orthographic Learning.

Authors:  Lindsay N Harris; Charles Perfetti
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-12-23

2.  Using information-theoretic measures to characterize the structure of the writing system: the case of orthographic-phonological regularities in English.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Devin M Kearns; Jay G Rueckl
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.