Literature DB >> 29333056

Individual Differences in Phonological Feedback Effects: Evidence for the Orthographic Recoding Hypothesis of Orthographic Learning.

Lindsay N Harris1, Charles Perfetti2.   

Abstract

Share (1995) has proposed phonological recoding (the translation of letters into sounds) as a self-teaching mechanism through which readers establish complete lexical representations. More recently, McKague et al. (2008) proposed a similar role for orthographic recoding, i.e., feedback from sounds to letters, in building and refining lexical representations. We reasoned that an interaction between feedback consistency measures and spelling ability in a spelling decision experiment would lend support to this hypothesis. In a linear mixed effects logistic regression of accuracy data this interaction was significant. Better spellers but not poorer spellers were immune to feedback effects in deciding if a word is spelled correctly, which is consistent with McKague et al.'s prediction that the impact of phonological feedback on word recognition will diminish when the orthographic representation for an item is fully specified. The study demonstrates the importance of considering individual differences when investigating the role of phonology in reading.

Entities:  

Keywords:  individual differences; lexical representations; orthographic learning; phonological feedback

Year:  2016        PMID: 29333056      PMCID: PMC5761328          DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2016.1258702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Stud Read        ISSN: 1088-8438


  15 in total

1.  A phoneme-grapheme feedback consistency effect.

Authors:  Conrad Perry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

2.  Effects of feedforward and feedback consistency on reading and spelling in dyslexia.

Authors:  Robert A I Davies; Brendan S Weekes
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2005-11

3.  Accounting for children's orthographic learning while reading text: do children self-teach?

Authors:  Anne E Cunningham
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2006-05-22

4.  Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis.

Authors:  D L Share
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1999-02

5.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison.

Authors:  R Frost; L Katz; S Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Phonological recoding and rapid orthographic learning in third-graders' silent reading: a critical test of the self-teaching hypothesis.

Authors:  Judith A Bowey; David Muller
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2005-08-10

Review 7.  Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition.

Authors:  D L Share
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1995-05

Review 8.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; S D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Differential effects of orthographic and phonological consistency in cortex for children with and without reading impairment.

Authors:  Donald J Bolger; Jennifer Minas; Douglas D Burman; James R Booth
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Early Word Reading of Preschoolers with ASD, Both With and Without Hyperlexia, Compared to Typically Developing Preschoolers.

Authors:  Dianne Macdonald; Gigi Luk; Eve-Marie Quintin
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.