Literature DB >> 7980258

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stent placement in the management of large common bile duct stones.

P Navicharern1, M Rhodes, D Flook, B Lawrie.   

Abstract

Management of large common bile duct (CBD) calculi is controversial. Endoscopic treatment is fraught with difficulty, particularly when stones are over one centimetre in diameter and the patient's coagulation is deranged. Between 1988 and 1993, 56 patients have been managed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stent placement as the initial treatment for large CBD calculi. Complete follow up has been possible in 50 cases (89.3%). The median age was 73.5 years (range 29-92) and primary presenting symptoms were jaundice (n = 39), cholangitis (n = 6) or abdominal pain (n = 5). Median bilirubin was 99 mumol/L (range 7-926) and 60% of the patients had deranged clotting with a median thrombotest of 61%. Stones ranged in size from 0.9 to 4.5 cm (median 1.6 cm). Treatment was with a 7F 'pigtail' stent in 39 cases and a 10F straight stent in 11 patients. Morbidity occurred in 12% of cases with two deaths (4%). Stents remained in place for a median of 1 month (range 0.2-59). Definitive treatment of CBD stones, once the jaundice and sepsis had settled, involved surgery in 24 patients and repeat ERCP with sphincterotomy +/- mechanical lithotripsy in 17 cases. Nine patients remain alive and well with their stents still in place. Initial management of large CBD calculi by ERCP and stent placement carries a low morbidity and mortality and is a useful adjunct in the management of a difficult clinical problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7980258     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04560.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  4 in total

1.  The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones.

Authors:  P Katsinelos; I Galanis; I Pilpilidis; G Paroutoglou; P Tsolkas; B Papaziogas; S Dimiropoulos; E Kamperis; D Katsiba; M Kalomenopoulou; A Papagiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A comparative evaluation of early stent occlusion among biliary conventional versus wing stents.

Authors:  Mouen A Khashab; Susan Hutfless; Katherine Kim; Anne Marie Lennon; Marcia I Canto; Sanjay B Jagannath; Patrick I Okolo; Eun Ji Shin; Vikesh K Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Long-term effects of forgotten biliary stents: a case series and literature review.

Authors:  Mehmet Odabasi; Cem Arslan; Sami Akbulut; Haci Hasan Abuoglu; Erkan Ozkan; Mehmet Kamil Yildiz; Cengiz Eris; Emre Gunay; Kemal Tekesin; Tolga Muftuoglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-15

4.  Common bile duct stenting for choledocholithiasis: a district general hospital experience.

Authors:  D J Bowrey; L J Fligelstone; A Solomon; G Thomas; A A Shandall
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.401

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.