Literature DB >> 18679709

Permanent stenting in "unextractable" common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents.

Franco Pisello1, Girolamo Geraci, Francesco Li Volsi, Giuseppe Modica, Carmelo Sciumè.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction is the treatment of choice for bile duct stones. Therefore, if ES and conventional stone extraction fail, further treatment is mandatory. Insertion of a biliary endoprosthesis is an effective option.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 30 high-risk patients (17 women and 13 men, mean age 82 years) affected by difficult common bile duct stones. The patients were randomly assigned preoperatively using closed envelopes (blind randomization) into two groups to receive insertion of polyethylene or hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stent, respectively. Follow-up was achieved by contacting referring physicians and patient's relatives.
RESULTS: Biliary drainage was established in all patients. Early minor complications occurred in 28%. In all these patients, the stent was a definitive measure. Median follow-up was 38 months. Late complications occurred in 34%. Cholangitis was the most frequent. During follow up, 11 patients died, two as result of a biliary-related cause. No statistically significant difference was observed on different stents patency.
CONCLUSION: Endoprosthesis insertion as a permanent therapy is an effective alternative to surgery or dissolution therapy. Therefore, biliary stenting should preferably be restricted to high-risk patients unfit for operative treatment and with a short life expectancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18679709     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-008-0388-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  36 in total

1.  Stenting or surgery for treatment of irretrievable common bile duct calculi in elderly patients?

Authors:  G D De Palma; C Catanzano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones.

Authors:  P Katsinelos; I Galanis; I Pilpilidis; G Paroutoglou; P Tsolkas; B Papaziogas; S Dimiropoulos; E Kamperis; D Katsiba; M Kalomenopoulou; A Papagiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [Prevention of clogging of biliary stents by administration of levofloxacin and ursodeoxycholic acid].

Authors:  Carmelo Sciumè; Girolamo Geraci; Franco Pisello; Tiziana Facella; Francesco Li Volsi; Giuseppe Modica
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

4.  A prospective randomized trial of Teflon versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  A M van Berkel; C Boland; W K Redekop; J J Bergman; A K Groen; G N Tytgat; K Huibregtse
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis in elderly patients with large bile duct stones: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  W Van Steenbergen; W Pelemans; J Fevery
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Prospective randomized trial comparing Tannenbaum Teflon and standard polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary stenosis.

Authors:  V Terruzzi; U Comin; F De Grazia; G L Toti; A Zambelli; S Beretta; G Minoli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial.

Authors:  G Costamagna; M Mutignani; G Rotondano; L Cipolletta; L Ghezzo; A Foco; A Zambelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Biliary endoprostheses for the management of retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J H Siegel; R P Yatto
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Omitting side-holes in biliary stents does not improve drainage of the obstructed biliary system: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  J J Sung; S C Chung; C P Tsui; A L Co; A K Li
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Hong Joo Kim; Hyo Sun Choi; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Seon Hyeong Choi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  8 in total

1.  Do not rush for surgery; stent placement may be an effective step for definitive treatment of initially unextractable common bile duct stones with ERCP.

Authors:  Wafi Attaallah; Asim Cingi; Sakir Karpuz; Mehmet Karakus; Omer Gunal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Long-term effects of forgotten biliary stents: a case series and literature review.

Authors:  Mehmet Odabasi; Cem Arslan; Sami Akbulut; Haci Hasan Abuoglu; Erkan Ozkan; Mehmet Kamil Yildiz; Cengiz Eris; Emre Gunay; Kemal Tekesin; Tolga Muftuoglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  Possible mortality reduction by endoscopic sphincterotomy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Cecilia Strömberg; Urban Arnelo; Lars Enochsson; Matthias Löhr; Magnus Nilsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Adverse events in older patients undergoing ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Lisa Lin; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-03-07

6.  The effect of biliary stenting on difficult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Fatih Aslan; Mahmut Arabul; Mustafa Celik; Emrah Alper; Belkıs Unsal
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-05

7.  Management of endoscopic biliary stenting for choledocholithiasis: Evaluation of stent-exchange intervals.

Authors:  Gen Tohda; Masaki Dochin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-01-16

8.  Multiple plastic biliary stent placement in the management of large and multiple choledochal stones: single center experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Hasan Bektaş; Bünyamin Gürbulak; Zeynep Deniz Şahin; Yiğit Düzköylü; Şükrü Çolak; Esin Kabul Gürbulak; Mehmet Emin Güneş; Ekrem Çakar
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.195

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.