Literature DB >> 23772266

Failure of sequential biliary stenting for unsuccessful common bile duct stone removal.

Varayu Prachayakul1, Pitulak Aswakul.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the factors associated with the failure of stone removal by a biliary stenting strategy.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 645 patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for stone removal in Siriraj GI Endoscopy center, Siriraj Hospital from June 2009 to June 2012. A total of 42 patients with unsuccessful initial removal of large CBD stones that underwent sequential biliary stenting were enrolled in the present study. The demographic data, laboratory results, stone characteristics, procedure details, and clinical outcomes were recorded and analyzed. In addition, the patients were classified into two groups based on outcome, successful or failed sequential biliary stenting, and the above factors were compared.
RESULTS: Among the initial 42 patients with unsuccessful initial removal of large CBD stones, there were 37 successful biliary stenting cases and five failed cases. Complete CBD clearance was achieved in 88.0% of cases. The average number of sessions needed before complete stone removal was achieved was 2.43 at an average of 25 wk after the first procedure. Complications during the follow-up period occurred in 19.1% of cases, comprising ascending cholangitis (14.3%) and pancreatitis (4.8%). The factors associated with failure of complete CBD stone clearance in the biliary stenting group were unchanged CBD stone size after the first biliary stenting attempt (10.2 wk) and a greater number of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography sessions performed (4.2 sessions).
CONCLUSION: The sequential biliary stenting is an effective management strategy for the failure of initial large CBD stone removal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary stenting; Biliary stenting failure; Common bile duct stone; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; Large common bile duct stone

Year:  2013        PMID: 23772266      PMCID: PMC3680618          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i6.288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  24 in total

1.  The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones.

Authors:  P Katsinelos; I Galanis; I Pilpilidis; G Paroutoglou; P Tsolkas; B Papaziogas; S Dimiropoulos; E Kamperis; D Katsiba; M Kalomenopoulou; A Papagiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Management of difficult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J Hochberger; S Tex; J Maiss; E G Hahn
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2003-10

3.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction.

Authors:  Constantine Karaliotas; George Sgourakis; Constantine Goumas; Nickolaos Papaioannou; Constantine Lilis; Emmanouel Leandros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of large difficult common bile duct stones: efficacy and analysis of factors that favor stone fragmentation.

Authors:  Manu Tandan; D Nageshwar Reddy; Darisetty Santosh; Venkat Reddy; Vinod Koppuju; Sandeep Lakhtakia; Rajesh Gupta; Mohan Ramchandani; Guduru Venkat Rao
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Effect of biliary stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid and terpene treatment on retained common bile duct stones in elderly patients: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Jimin Han; Jong Ho Moon; Hyun Cheol Koo; Jee Heon Kang; Joon Hyuck Choi; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Moon Sung Lee; Ho Gak Kim
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones.

Authors:  K F Binmoeller; T W Schafer
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Poorly expandable common bile duct with stones on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Authors:  Chi-Liang Cheng; Yung-Kuan Tsou; Cheng-Hui Lin; Jui-Hsiang Tang; Chien-Fu Hung; Kai-Feng Sung; Ching-Song Lee; Nai-Jen Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Difficult bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lee McHenry; Glen Lehman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04

9.  The increase in balloon size to over 15 mm does not affect the development of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation for bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Young Hoon Youn; Hyun Chul Lim; Jae Hoon Jahng; Sung Il Jang; Jung Hwan You; Jung Soo Park; Se Joon Lee; Dong Ki Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone versus endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation for the treatment of large bile duct stones.

Authors:  Jae Chul Hwang; Jin Hong Kim; Sun Gyo Lim; Soon Sun Kim; Sung Jae Shin; Kee Myung Lee; Byung Moo Yoo
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  2 in total

1.  Endoscopic biliary stenting in irretrievable common bile duct stones: stent exchange or expectant management-tertiary-centre experience and systematic review.

Authors:  Noor Mohammed; Matthew Pinder; Keith Harris; Simon M Everett
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-22

2.  Endoscopic Management of the Difficult Bile Duct Stones: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.

Authors:  Bülent Ödemiş; Ufuk Barış Kuzu; Erkin Öztaş; Fatih Saygılı; Nuretdin Suna; Orhan Coskun; Adem Aksoy; Zeliha Sırtaş; Derya Arı; Yener Akpınar
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.260

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.