Literature DB >> 12915195

Quantitative assessment of Gd-DTPA contrast agent from signal enhancement: an in-vitro study.

J Mørkenborg1, M Pedersen, F T Jensen, H Stødkilde-Jørgensen, J C Djurhuus, J Frøkiaer.   

Abstract

Quantitative determination of in-vivo gadolinium diethylenetriamine-pentaacid (Gd-DTPA) concentration is attractive in various studies involving perfusion, tracer kinetics and permeability constants. Using a 1.5 T clinical system and a 7 T small-bore system, we evaluated a method for absolute determination of Gd-DTPA concentrations in plasma solutions. Different solutions of Gd-DTPA and (99m)Tc-DTPA were mixed in human plasma and concentrations in the range of 0-5.0 mmol/l (1.5 T system) or 0-3.0 mmol/l (7 T system) of Gd-DTPA were divided into thirteen tubes. All MRI measurements were carried out using conventional sequences (SE, FLASH and GRASS). The MR measured intensity was converted to Gd-DTPA concentration by mathematical interpretation of the sequences. All MRI sequences showed, that the measured concentrations of Gd-DTPA revealed a slight non-linear difference compared with the calculated Gd-DTPA concentrations determined by the plasma (99m)Tc-DTPA using gamma counting. This non-linearity was most pronounced at high Gd-DTPA concentrations, suggesting that the discrepancy could be a result of an increased plasma relaxivity at higher concentrations. Adjustment of measured Gd-DTPA concentration was therefore performed using a selected power function, A[Gd-DTPA](a), which yielded the best linear relationship. Regression analysis showed that the scaling constant (A) varied from 0.11 to 97.45 and the power constant (a) varied from 0.83 to 1.6. Based on these constants, the MRI measured concentrations of Gd-DTPA did not differ from the calculated concentrations of Gd-DTPA obtained from reference measurements of (99m)Tc-DTPA. In the 1.5 T system, a linear relationship (r(2) > or = 0.95) was demonstrated in the range of 0-5.0 mmol/l Gd-DTPA, and in the 7 T system, a linear relationship (r(2) > or = 0.92) was demonstrated in the range of 0-3.0 mmol/l Gd-DTPA. Additionally, the effect of signal-to-noise on measured concentrations of Gd-DTPA was simulated using MR data of the mixed solutions of Gd-DTPA in plasma and the analytical expression of the pulse sequences. The simulations showed that the concentrations were most sensitive to noise in the GRASS sequence. In conclusion, this study demonstrates a novel approach to quantify accurately the Gd-DTPA concentration directly from MRI signal data using different routine sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915195     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(03)00096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  11 in total

1.  Effects of inversion and saturation times on relationships between contrast agent concentrations and signal intensities of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Mahmood Nazarpoor
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-02-27

2.  Quantitative assessment of macromolecular concentration during direct infusion into an agarose hydrogel phantom using contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Xiaoming Chen; Garrett W Astary; Hector Sepulveda; Thomas H Mareci; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Jeannette Wilkins Award: Can locally delivered gadolinium be visualized on MRI? A pilot study.

Authors:  Morgan B Giers; Chris S Estes; Alex C McLaren; Michael R Caplan; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Relative diffusion of paramagnetic metal complexes of MRI contrast agents in an isotropic hydrogel medium.

Authors:  Bimali Sanjeevani Weerakoon; Toshiaki Osuga
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-08-17

Review 5.  Clinical utility of quantitative imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Rathan M Subramaniam; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Novel ultrasound and DCE-MRI analyses after antiangiogenic treatment with a selective VEGF receptor inhibitor.

Authors:  Katherine D Watson; Xiaowen Hu; Chun-Yen Lai; Heather A Lindfors; Dana D Hu-Lowe; Theresa A Tuthill; David R Shalinsky; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Clinical application of pharmacokinetic analysis as a biomarker of solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Hatsuho Mamata; Junichi Tokuda; Ritu R Gill; Robert F Padera; Robert E Lenkinski; David J Sugarbaker; James P Butler; Hiroto Hatabu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Pulmonary perfusion imaging in the rodent lung using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Nilesh N Mistry; James Pollaro; Jiayu Song; Ming De Lin; G Allan Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Spatiotemporal quantification of local drug delivery using MRI.

Authors:  Morgan B Giers; Alex C McLaren; Jonathan D Plasencia; David Frakes; Ryan McLemore; Michael R Caplan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Extracellular diffusion quantified by magnetic resonance imaging during rat C6 glioma cell progression.

Authors:  G Song; T Luo; L Dong; Q Liu
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.