Literature DB >> 25442800

Clinical utility of quantitative imaging.

Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Mishal Mendiratta-Lala2, Brian J Bartholmai3, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan4, Richard G Abramson5, Kirsteen R Burton6, John-Paul J Yu7, Ernest M Scalzetti8, Thomas E Yankeelov9, Rathan M Subramaniam10, Leon Lenchik11.   

Abstract

Quantitative imaging (QI) is increasingly applied in modern radiology practice, assisting in the clinical assessment of many patients and providing a source of biomarkers for a spectrum of diseases. QI is commonly used to inform patient diagnosis or prognosis, determine the choice of therapy, or monitor therapy response. Because most radiologists will likely implement some QI tools to meet the patient care needs of their referring clinicians, it is important for all radiologists to become familiar with the strengths and limitations of QI. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Quantitative Imaging Task Force has explored the clinical application of QI and summarizes its work in this review. We provide an overview of the clinical use of QI by discussing QI tools that are currently used in clinical practice, clinical applications of these tools, approaches to reporting of QI, and challenges to implementing QI. It is hoped that these insights will help radiologists recognize the tangible benefits of QI to their patients, their referring clinicians, and their own radiology practice.
Copyright © 2015 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiology; biomarker; quantitative imaging; radiologist

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442800      PMCID: PMC4259826          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  107 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification.

Authors:  S Obenauer; K P Hermann; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Jill Cole; Maureen Sanderson; Everett F Magann; James A Scardo
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  Quantitative assessment of dynamic PET imaging data in cancer imaging.

Authors:  Mark Muzi; Finbarr O'Sullivan; David A Mankoff; Robert K Doot; Larry A Pierce; Brenda F Kurland; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Left ventricular ejection fraction determined with the nuclear stethoscope, gamma camera and contrast ventriculography.

Authors:  O Lund; K Rasmussen; F T Jensen; H H Hansen
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 6.  Fast magnetic resonance imaging of the heart.

Authors:  H Sakuma; K Takeda; C B Higgins
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Effects of CT section thickness and reconstruction kernel on emphysema quantification relationship to the magnitude of the CT emphysema index.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Andrew J Bierhals; Cliff K Choong; Seth T Bartel; Jon H Ritter; Nitin A Das; Cheng Hong; Thomas K Pilgram; Kyongtae T Bae; Bruce R Whiting; Jason C Woods; James C Hogg; Barbara A Lutey; Richard J Battafarano; Joel D Cooper; Bryan F Meyers; G Alexander Patterson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging for neurosurgical planning in neurooncology.

Authors:  Erik-Jan Vlieger; Charles B Majoie; Sieger Leenstra; Gerard J Den Heeten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Distribution of renal tumor growth rates determined by using serial volumetric CT measurements.

Authors:  Jingbo Zhang; Stella K Kang; Liang Wang; Abdelkarim Touijer; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evaluation criteria in solid tumors reliable?

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Carmen Ayuso; María Varela; Jordi Rimola; Amelia J Hessheimer; Carlos Rodriguez de Lope; María Reig; Luís Bianchi; Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  23 in total

1.  Quantitative radiomics: impact of stochastic effects on textural feature analysis implies the need for standards.

Authors:  Matthew J Nyflot; Fei Yang; Darrin Byrd; Stephen R Bowen; George A Sandison; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-08-05

2.  Repeatability of dynamic contrast enhanced vp parameter in healthy subjects and patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  Moran Artzi; Gilad Liberman; Deborah T Blumenthal; Felix Bokstein; Orna Aizenstein; Dafna Ben Bashat
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Acceleration of spleen segmentation with end-to-end deep learning method and automated pipeline.

Authors:  Hyeonsoo Moon; Yuankai Huo; Richard G Abramson; Richard Alan Peters; Albert Assad; Tamara K Moyo; Michael R Savona; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 4.  Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker development.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Lung Mass in Smokers.

Authors:  George R Washko; Gregory L Kinney; James C Ross; Raúl San José Estépar; MeiLan K Han; Mark T Dransfield; Victor Kim; Hiroto Hatabu; Carolyn E Come; Russell P Bowler; Edwin K Silverman; James Crapo; David A Lynch; John Hokanson; Alejandro A Diaz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  MR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  Structured reporting adds clinical value in primary CT staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Franziska Schoeppe; Wieland H Sommer; Dominik Nörenberg; Mareike Verbeek; Christian Bogner; C Benedikt Westphalen; Martin Dreyling; Ernst J Rummeny; Alexander A Fingerle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy of quantitative mri of the breast in the community radiology setting.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Chengyue Wu; Stephanie L Barnes; Angela M Jarrett; Sarah Avery; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Jeffery J Luci; Hakmook Kang; Richard G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov; John Virostko
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Validation and estimation of spleen volume via computer-assisted segmentation on clinically acquired CT scans.

Authors:  Yiyuan Yang; Yucheng Tang; Riqiang Gao; Shunxing Bao; Yuankai Huo; Matthew T McKenna; Michael R Savona; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-02-19

10.  Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Head and Neck Cancer Care: Opportunities, Mechanics, and Challenges.

Authors:  Lisanne V van Dijk; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2021-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.