Literature DB >> 22231729

Clinical application of pharmacokinetic analysis as a biomarker of solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Hatsuho Mamata1, Junichi Tokuda, Ritu R Gill, Robert F Padera, Robert E Lenkinski, David J Sugarbaker, James P Butler, Hiroto Hatabu.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate perfusion indices and pharmacokinetic parameters in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). Thirty patients of 34 enrolled with SPNs (15-30 mm) were evaluated in this study. T1 and T2-weighted structural images and 2D turbo FLASH perfusion images were acquired with shallow free breathing. B-spline nonrigid image registration and optimization by χ² test against pharmacokinetic model curve were performed on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. This allowed voxel-by-voxel calculation of k(ep) , the rate constant for tracer transport to and from plasma and the extravascular extracellular space. Mean transit time, time-to-peak, initial slope, and maximum enhancement (E(max) ) were calculated from time-intensity curves fitted to a gamma variate function. After blinded data analysis, correlation with tissue histology from surgical resection or biopsy samples was performed. Histologic evaluation revealed 25 malignant and five benign SPNs. All benign SPNs had k(ep) < 1.0 min⁻¹. Nineteen of 25 (76%) malignant SPNs showed k(ep) > 1.0 min⁻¹. Sensitivity to diagnose malignant SPNs at a cutoff of k(ep) = 1.0 min⁻¹ was 76%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, negative predictive value was 45%, and accuracy was 80%. Of all indices studied, k(ep) was the most significant in differentiating malignant from benign SPNs.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22231729      PMCID: PMC3335927          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  40 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Effects of inversion and saturation times on relationships between contrast agent concentrations and signal intensities of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Mahmood Nazarpoor
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-02-27

3.  Solitary pulmonary nodules: pathological outcome of 150 consecutively resected lesions.

Authors:  Ben Davies; Sudip Ghosh; David Hopkinson; Roger Vaughan; Gaetano Rocco
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-12-17

4.  Quantitative investigation of solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and histopathologic analysis.

Authors:  Yu Zou; Minming Zhang; Qidong Wang; Desheng Shang; Lijun Wang; Guowei Yu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Pulmonary perfusion: qualitative assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using ultra-short TE and inversion recovery turbo FLASH.

Authors:  H Hatabu; J Gaa; D Kim; W Li; P V Prasad; R R Edelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography.

Authors:  M Kaneko; K Eguchi; H Ohmatsu; R Kakinuma; T Naruke; K Suemasu; N Moriyama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Magnetic resonance perfusion and permeability imaging in brain tumors.

Authors:  Saulo Lacerda; Meng Law
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  U Pastorino
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Reproducibility of perfusion parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of lung and liver tumors: effect on estimates of patient sample size in clinical trials and on individual patient responses.

Authors:  Chaan S Ng; David L Raunig; Edward F Jackson; Edward A Ashton; Frederick Kelcz; Kevin B Kim; Razelle Kurzrock; Teresa M McShane
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  6 in total

1.  Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of pulmonary lesions using golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging.

Authors:  Lihua Chen; Daihong Liu; Jiuquan Zhang; Bing Xie; Xiaoyue Zhou; Robert Grimm; Xuequan Huang; Jian Wang; Li Feng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation of lung cancer from obstructive lung consolidation: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic analysis from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Li-li Wang; Jiang Lin; Kai Liu; Cai-zhong Chen; Hui Liu; Peng Lv; Cai-xia Fu; Meng-su Zeng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  State of the art: Response assessment in lung cancer in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Mizuki Nishino; Hiroto Hatabu; Bruce E Johnson; Theresa C McLoud
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Concentration-dependent Early Antivascular and Antitumor Effects of Itraconazole in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  David E Gerber; William C Putnam; Farjana J Fattah; Kemp H Kernstine; Rolf A Brekken; Ivan Pedrosa; Rachael Skelton; Jessica M Saltarski; Robert E Lenkinski; Richard D Leff; Chul Ahn; Chyndhri Padmanabhan; Vaidehi Chembukar; Sahba Kasiri; Raja Reddy Kallem; Indhumathy Subramaniyan; Qing Yuan; Quyen N Do; Yin Xi; Scott I Reznik; Lorraine Pelosof; Brandon Faubert; Ralph J DeBerardinis; James Kim
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  DCE-MRI Perfusion and Permeability Parameters as predictors of tumor response to CCRT in Patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Authors:  Xiuli Tao; Lvhua Wang; Zhouguang Hui; Li Liu; Feng Ye; Ying Song; Yu Tang; Yu Men; Tryphon Lambrou; Zihua Su; Xiao Xu; Han Ouyang; Ning Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT: Which is better in differentiation between malignant and benign solitary pulmonary nodules?

Authors:  Feng Feng; Fulin Qiang; Aijun Shen; Donghui Shi; Aiyan Fu; Haiming Li; Mingzhu Zhang; Ganlin Xia; Peng Cao
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.087

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.