Literature DB >> 2686914

Mechanisms of resistance in anaerobes and new developments in testing.

S M Finegold1.   

Abstract

Anaerobic bacteria currently demonstrate increased resistance to antimicrobial agents, primarily by the production of beta-lactamase. A number of species of Bacteroides, most notably those in the Bacteroides fragilis group, produce these enzymes. A few species of Fusobacterium and Clostridium produce beta-lactamase as well. Fortunately, this mechanism of resistance is readily overcome by administering beta-lactamase inhibitors coupled with a beta-lactam antibiotic that would otherwise be inactivated. Other types of resistance encountered in anaerobic bacteria include inactivating enzymes such as chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, plasmid-mediated transferable multiple-drug resistance, changes in porin molecules in the outer membrane of the bacterial cell, decreased uptake of drug by other mechanisms, changes in the target organs such as penicillin-binding proteins, and decreased reduction of the antibiotic to an active intermediate product. In many institutions, certain drugs such as cefoxitin, clindamycin, and piperacillin, which were previously active against almost all strains of B. fragilis, are now effective against only 70 to 85% of this group of anaerobes. Drugs with essentially 100% activity against most anaerobic bacteria include chloramphenicol, imipenem, metronidazole, and the combinations of a beta-lactam antibiotic plus a beta-lactamase inhibitor such as ampicillin plus sulbactam and amoxicillin or ticarcillin combined with sodium clavulanate. This paper also discusses the indications for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes as well as problems encountered with testing techniques that are currently being used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2686914     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90123-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current antimicrobial therapy of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  C V Sanders; K E Aldridge
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  J Wüst; U Hardegger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Do antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of colonic isolates of Bacteroides species change after antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitine during elective abdominal surgery?

Authors:  Nurver Ulger Toprak; Bahadir M Güllüoğlu; Ozlem Cakici; M Levhi Akin; Pakize Demirkalem; Tuncay Celenk; Güner Söyletir
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  In vitro activity of ceftriaxone combined with tazobactam against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  J Wüst; U Hardegger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Influence of antibiotics on the recovery and kinetics of Saccharomyces boulardii in rats.

Authors:  A V Boddy; G W Elmer; L V McFarland; R H Levy
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Effect of beta-lactamase inhibitors on beta-lactamases from anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  M Hedberg; L Lindqvist; K Tunér; C E Nord
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Regulation of a Bacteroides operon that controls excision and transfer of the conjugative transposon CTnDOT.

Authors:  Yanping Wang; Nadja B Shoemaker; Abigail A Salyers
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.490

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.