Literature DB >> 28435913

A prospective clinical study comparing MI-TLIF with unilateral versus bilateral transpedicular fixation in low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

José-Antonio Soriano-Sánchez1, Javier Quillo-Olvera2, Sergio Soriano-Solis1, Miroslava-Elizabeth Soriano-Lopez1, Claudia-Angélica Covarrubias-Rosas3, Javier Quillo-Reséndiz2, Carlos-Francisco Gutiérrez-Partida1, Manuel Rodríguez-García1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) has become one of the standard techniques for approaching ipsilateral decompression, anterior column fusion, and posterior stabilization. This procedure is usually accompanied by the placement of bilateral transpedicular screws in the corresponding segment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of unilateral screw fixation compared with bilateral fixation in patients diagnosed with low-grade symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent an MI-TLIF technique.
METHODS: A prospective and comparative study was performed in 67 patients with grade 1 symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis. The sample was allocated on both unilateral fixation group (n=33) and bilateral fixation group (n=34). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), preoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Changes over time and differences between the groups were analyzed. Statistical analyses included: Friedman test, Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney's U. A two-tailed P value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: During 1-year of evaluation there were no significant clinical differences between both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with grade 1 symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with MI-TLIF with unilateral screw fixation had similar clinical results than those treated with bilateral fixation at 12 months postoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Transpedicular screw fixation; minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF); spine surgery; surgical procedures

Year:  2017        PMID: 28435913      PMCID: PMC5386907          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2017.03.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  16 in total

1.  Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  K S Suk; H M Lee; N H Kim; J W Ha
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Will F Beringer; Jean-Pierre Mobasser
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation with minimally invasive TLIF for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disk disease: 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  Erkin Sonmez; Ilker Coven; Fikret Sahinturk; Cem Yilmaz; Hakan Caner
Journal:  Turk Neurosurg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.003

Review 4.  Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of the technique, indications and graft materials.

Authors:  Y-X Xiao; Q-X Chen; F-C Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Huaming Xue; Yihui Tu; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Harel Deutsch; Michael J Musacchio
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Technical note and preliminary report on 47 cases.

Authors:  Jonathan Tuttle; Ahmed Shakir; Haroon Fiaz Choudhri
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter; Brett A Freedman; Eric G Verwiebe; Jordan M Hall; David W Polly; Timothy R Kuklo
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-08

9.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Langston T Holly; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

10.  The effect of spinal implant rigidity on vertebral bone density. A canine model.

Authors:  P C McAfee; I D Farey; C E Sutterlin; K R Gurr; K E Warden; B W Cunningham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single segmental lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimum two-year follow up.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Zhi-Chao Hu; Xiao-Bin Li; Zhen-Hua Feng; Dong Chen; Hui Xu; Qi-Shan Huang; Yan Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang; Kai Zhang; Jie Zhao; Wen-Fei Ni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

2.  Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide.

Authors:  Sara Lener; Christoph Wipplinger; R Nick Hernandez; Ibrahim Hussain; Sertac Kirnaz; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Eliana Kim; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.