Literature DB >> 19876659

Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach.

ShunWu Fan1, ZhiJun Hu, FengDong Zhao, Xing Zhao, Yue Huang, Xiangqian Fang.   

Abstract

We set out to determine whether a minimally invasive approach for one-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion reduced undesirable changes in the multifidus muscle, compared to a conventional open approach. We also investigated associations between muscle injury during surgery (creatinine kinase levels), clinical outcome and changes in the multifidus at follow-up. We studied 59 patients treated by one team of surgeons at a single institution (minimally invasive approach in 28 and conventional open approach in 31, voluntarily chosen by patients). More than 1 year postoperatively, all the patients were followed up with the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI), and 16 patients from each group were evaluated using MRI. This enabled the cross-sectional area (CSA) of lean multifidus muscle, and the T2 signal intensity ratio of multifidus to psoas muscle, to be compared at the operative and adjacent levels. The minimally invasive group had less postoperative back pain (P < 0.001) and lower postoperative ODI scores (P = 0.001). Multifidus atrophy was less in the minimally invasive group (P < 0.001), with mean reductions in CSA of 12.2% at the operative and 8.5% at the adjacent levels, compared to 36.8% and 29.3% in the conventional open group. The increase in the multifidus:psoas T2 signal intensity ratio was similarly less marked in the minimally invasive group where values increased by 10.6% at the operative and 8.3% at the adjacent levels, compared to 34.4 and 22.7% in the conventional open group (P < 0.001). These changes in multifidus CSA and T2 signal intensity ratio were significantly correlated with postoperative creatinine kinase levels, VAS scores and ODI scores (P < 0.01). The minimally invasive approach caused less change in multifidus, less postoperative back pain and functional disability than conventional open approach. Muscle damage during surgery was significantly correlated with long-term multifidus muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration. Furthermore these degenerative changes of multifidus were also significantly correlated with long-term clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19876659      PMCID: PMC2899808          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1191-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  L A Danneels; G G Vanderstraeten; D C Cambier; E E Witvrouw; H J De Cuyper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The ALIF concept.

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Larry T Khoo; Sylvain Palmer; Daniel T Laich; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation.

Authors:  Robert E Isaacs; Vinod K Podichetty; Paul Santiago; Faheem A Sandhu; John Spears; Kevin Kelly; Laurie Rice; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-08

Review 6.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies.

Authors:  Kathryn J Stevens; David B Spenciner; Karen L Griffiths; Kee D Kim; Marike Zwienenberg-Lee; Todd Alamin; Roland Bammer
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-04

8.  Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle thickness after various lumbar back surgery procedures.

Authors:  H Suwa; J Hanakita; N Ohshita; K Gotoh; N Matsuoka; A Morizane
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach.

Authors:  Yung Park; Joong Won Ha
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Langston T Holly; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02
View more
  80 in total

1.  Percutaneous pars interarticularis screw fixation: a technical note.

Authors:  Lester Wilson; Farhaan Altaf; Philippa Tyler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Toshitada Miwa; Hironobu Sakaura; Tomoya Yamashita; Shozo Suzuki; Tetsuo Ohwada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Stand-alone ALIF with integrated intracorporeal anchoring plates in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc disease: a prospective study on 65 cases.

Authors:  Jérôme Allain; Joël Delecrin; Jacques Beaurain; Alexandre Poignard; Thierry Vila; Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A comparison of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jianhua Lyu; Kai Chen; Zhaohui Tang; Yu Chen; Ming Li; Qiulin Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Percutaneous techniques in the thoracic and lumbar spine].

Authors:  T R Blattert; S Katscher; C Josten
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial.

Authors:  Eike K Hoff; Patrick Strube; Matthias Pumberger; Robert K Zahn; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Does pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar multifidus muscle predict clinical outcomes following lumbar spinal decompression for symptomatic spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Mario G T Zotti; F Vilas Boas; T Clifton; M Piche; W W Yoon; B J C Freeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [Risk factors for surgical site infection following posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion].

Authors:  Chaohui Sang; Hailong Ren; Zhandong Meng; Jianming Jiang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-07-30

9.  Comparative outcomes of epidural steroids versus placebo after lumbar discectomy in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alisara Arirachakaran; Montree Siripaiboonkij; Saran Pairuchvej; Kittipong Setrkraising; Pritsanai Pruttikul; Chaiwat Piyasakulkaew; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-05-29

Review 10.  Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christina L Goldstein; Kevin Macwan; Kala Sundararajan; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.