Literature DB >> 12882376

Effects of postconditioning inflation on odor + taste compound conditioning.

W Robert Batsell1, Christina A Trost, Stephanie R Cochran, Aaron G Blankenship, John D Batson.   

Abstract

The within-compound association approach has been proposed as an account of synergistic conditioning in flavor aversion learning. One prediction from the within-compound association approach is that following taste + odor compound conditioning, postconditioning inflation of one element of the compound should increase responding to the second element. In four experiments with rats, the AX+/A+ design was used to determine whether postconditioning inflation of A would increase responding to X. In Experiments 1 and 3, responding to X was significantly stronger after AX+/A+ conditioning, as compared with AX+ conditioning. In Experiments 2 and 4, the specificity of the inflation effect was demonstrated, because AX+/A+ conditioning produced a stronger aversion to X than did AX+/B+ conditioning. Furthermore, it appears that the taste + odor association is symmetrical because inflation of the taste aversion increased responding to the odor (Experiments 1 and 2) and inflation of the odor aversion increased responding to the taste (Experiments 3 and 4).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12882376     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  10 in total

1.  Augmentation of taste conditioning by a preconditioned odor.

Authors:  W R Batsell; J D Batson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-07

2.  Taste preconditioning augments odor-aversion learning.

Authors:  W R Batsell; G Y Paschall; D I Gleason; J D Batson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-01

3.  Augmentation, not blocking, in an A+/AX+ flavor-conditioning procedure.

Authors:  J D Batson; W R Batsell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

4.  Overshadowing and stimulus intensity.

Authors:  N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1976-05

5.  Paradoxical effects of proximal unconditioned stimulus preexposure: interference with and conditioning of a taste aversion.

Authors:  M Domjan; M R Best
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1977-10

6.  Flavor-illness aversions: potentiation of odor by taste in rats.

Authors:  K W Rusiniak; W G Hankins; J Garcia; L P Brett
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1979-01

7.  Characteristics of the lithium-mediated proximal US-preexposure effect in flavor-aversion conditioning.

Authors:  M R Best; M Domjan
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1979-11

8.  Flavour-odour compound conditioning: odour-potentiation and flavour-attenuation.

Authors:  R F Westbrook; J Homewood; K Horn; J C Clarke
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1983-02

9.  Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: an analysis in terms of within-compound associations.

Authors:  P J Durlach; R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1980-04

10.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Taste + odor interactions in compound aversion conditioning.

Authors:  Christina A Trost; W Robert Batsell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Differences in taste-potentiated odor aversions with O+/OT+ versus OT+/O+ conditioning: Implications for configural associations.

Authors:  John D Batson; Jennifer H Watkins; Karen Doyle; W Robert Batsell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Potentiation in young infants: the origin of the prior knowledge effect?

Authors:  Rachel Barr; Carolyn Rovee-Collier; Amy Learmonth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

4.  Why a neuromaturational model of memory fails: exuberant learning in early infancy.

Authors:  Carolyn Rovee-Collier; Amy Giles
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 1.777

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.