Literature DB >> 11199513

Taste preconditioning augments odor-aversion learning.

W R Batsell1, G Y Paschall, D I Gleason, J D Batson.   

Abstract

On the basis of previous work that has shown a taste can potentiate odor-aversion conditioning in AX+ conditioning, 6 experiments used rats to examine the effects of pairing a preconditioned taste (A) with a novel odor cue (X) in an A+/AX+ aversion conditioning design. Experiments 1A and 1B demonstrated that a preconditioned taste produced a robust odor aversion that was significantly stronger than a potentiated odor aversion. The results of Experiment 2 showed that the robust odor aversion produced by A+/AX+ conditioning was not the result of the potentiated odor aversion summating with generalization from the taste aversion. The augmented odor aversion was produced only when the taste and odor stimuli were presented simultaneously (Experiment 3) and the preconditioned taste aversion was intact at compound conditioning (Experiment 4). Pairing a novel odor with a preconditioned taste was not sufficient to condition an aversion to odor (Experiment 5), although other results implicated a role for an association between odor and taste in the odor augmentation effect (Experiment 6). The present results have implications for current models of taste + odor interactions in flavor-aversion conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11199513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  10 in total

1.  Effects of postconditioning inflation on odor + taste compound conditioning.

Authors:  W Robert Batsell; Christina A Trost; Stephanie R Cochran; Aaron G Blankenship; John D Batson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  CS-US interval determines the transition from overshadowing to potentiation with flavor compounds.

Authors:  W Robert Batsell; Elizabeth Wakefield; Leigh Ann Ulrey; Katie Reimink; Steven L Rowe; Scott Dexheimer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  A conditioned aversion study of sucrose and SC45647 taste in TRPM5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Meghan C Eddy; Benjamin K Eschle; Darlene Peterson; Nathan Lauras; Robert F Margolskee; Eugene R Delay
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Taste + odor interactions in compound aversion conditioning.

Authors:  Christina A Trost; W Robert Batsell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Limitations on representation-mediated potentiation of flavour or odour aversions.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  A dissociation between causal judgment and outcome recall.

Authors:  Chris J Mitchell; Peter F Lovibond; Chee York Gan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

7.  Differences in taste-potentiated odor aversions with O+/OT+ versus OT+/O+ conditioning: Implications for configural associations.

Authors:  John D Batson; Jennifer H Watkins; Karen Doyle; W Robert Batsell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Multi-modal cue integration in the black garden ant.

Authors:  Massimo De Agrò; Felix Benjamin Oberhauser; Maria Loconsole; Gabriella Galli; Federica Dal Cin; Enzo Moretto; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Olfactory blocking and odorant similarity in the honeybee.

Authors:  Fernando Guerrieri; Harald Lachnit; Bertram Gerber; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Potentiation and overshadowing in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.