Literature DB >> 12835446

Public views on healthcare performance indicators and patient choice.

Helen Magee1, Lucy-Jane Davis, Angela Coulter.   

Abstract

Patients on certain waiting lists in the UK National Health Service (NHS) are now offered the choice of persevering with their home hospital or switching to another hospital where they will be treated on a guaranteed date. Such decisions require knowledge of performance. We used facilitated focus groups to investigate the views of patients and members of the public on publication of information about the performance of healthcare providers. Six groups with a total of 50 participants met in six different locations in England. Participants felt that independent monitoring of healthcare performance is necessary, but they were ambivalent about the value of performance indicators and hospital rankings. They tended to distrust government information and preferred the presentational style of 'Dr Foster', a commercial information provider, because it gave more detailed locally relevant information. Many participants felt the NHS did not offer much scope for choice of provider. If public access to performance information is to succeed in informing referral decisions and raising quality standards, the public and general practitioners will need education on how to interpret and use the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12835446      PMCID: PMC539537          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.96.7.338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  13 in total

Review 1.  Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS). Foreword.

Authors:  C Crofton; J S Lubalin; C Darby
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Providing consumers with information about the quality of health plans: the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans demonstration in Washington State.

Authors:  E Guadagnoli; A M Epstein; A Zaslavsky; J A Shaul; D Veroff; F J Fowler; P D Cleary
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2000-07

Review 3.  What cognitive science tells us about the design of reports for consumers.

Authors:  Mary E Vaiana; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Is the informed-choice policy approach appropriate for Medicare beneficiaries?

Authors:  J H Hibbard; P Slovic; E Peters; M L Finucane; M Tusler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public.

Authors:  E C Schneider; T Lieberman
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06

6.  Hospital mortality league tables.

Authors:  Bobbie Jacobson; Jenny Mindell; Martin McKee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

7.  Effective reports for health care quality data: lessons from a CAHPS demonstration in Washington State.

Authors:  D R Veroff; P M Gallagher; V Wilson; M Uyeda; J Merselis; E Guadagnoli; S Edgman-Levitan; A Zaslavsky; S Kleimann; P D Cleary
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Health plan report cards and insurance choice.

Authors:  M Chernew; D P Scanlon
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  A guide to facilitating consumer choice.

Authors:  E W Hoy; E K Wicks; R A Forland
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Impact of report cards on employees: a natural experiment.

Authors:  D J Knutson; E A Kind; J B Fowles; S Adlis
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1998
View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Signe Flottorp; Liv Helen Rygh; Katherine H O Deane; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

2.  Not everything that counts can be counted; not everything that can be counted counts.

Authors:  Martin McKee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

Review 3.  What do patients and the public want from primary care?

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-11-19

4.  Data sources and performance measurement.

Authors:  Stephen Singleton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-13

5.  Consumers' interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Development of an information source for patients and the public about general practice services: an action research study.

Authors:  Martin Marshall; Jenny Noble; Helen Davies; Heather Waterman; Kieran Walshe; Rod Sheaff; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Patient Navigators and Parent Use of Quality Data: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Sarah L Goff; Kathleen M Mazor; Penelope S Pekow; Katharine O White; Aruna Priya; Tara Lagu; Haley Guhn-Knight; Lorna Murphy; Yara Youssef Budway; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Raising the benchmark for the 21st century--the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: outcomes, consultant-supervised training and sourcing NHS choice.

Authors:  Farhan H Zaidi; Melanie C Corbett; Ben J L Burton; Philip A Bloom
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Barbara Conner-Spady; Claudia Sanmartin; Geoffrey Johnston; John McGurran; Melissa Kehler; Tom Noseworthy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Online assessment of patients' views on hospital performances using Rasch model's KIDMAP diagram.

Authors:  Tsair-Wei Chien; Wen-Chung Wang; Hsien-Yi Wang; Hung-Jung Lin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.