Literature DB >> 11877877

What cognitive science tells us about the design of reports for consumers.

Mary E Vaiana1, Elizabeth A McGlynn.   

Abstract

The health services literature many articles related to expanding and refining quality measures. But the rich body of empirical research on how people process information has rarely been applied to the challenge of presenting complex information about health care in ways that facilitate its comprehension and use. In this article, the authors review key findings from this research. Based on their review, the authors develop some general principles for presenting information and demonstrate their utility by assessing three Web sites that report performance data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11877877     DOI: 10.1177/107755870205900101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  29 in total

Review 1.  What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Burkell
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-04

2.  Meeting information needs to facilitate decision making: report cards for people with disabilities.

Authors:  Susan E Palsbo; Thilo Kroll
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Control, compare and communicate: designing control charts to summarise efficiently data from multiple quality indicators.

Authors:  B Guthrie; T Love; T Fahey; A Morris; F Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-12

4.  Can limiting choice increase social welfare? The elderly and health insurance.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Thomas Rice
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Responsive consumerism: empowerment in markets for health plans.

Authors:  Brian Elbel; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Consumers' interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Public views on healthcare performance indicators and patient choice.

Authors:  Helen Magee; Lucy-Jane Davis; Angela Coulter
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Participatory design of mass health communication in three languages for seniors and people with disabilities on Medicaid.

Authors:  Linda Neuhauser; Beccah Rothschild; Carrie Graham; Susan L Ivey; Susana Konishi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  An international comparison of web-based reporting about health care quality: content analysis.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Ylva Ka van den Hengel; A Jeanne M van Loon; Jany Rademakers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.