Literature DB >> 17050577

Raising the benchmark for the 21st century--the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: outcomes, consultant-supervised training and sourcing NHS choice.

Farhan H Zaidi1, Melanie C Corbett, Ben J L Burton, Philip A Bloom.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical outcomes for phacoemulsification surgery are still compared with the almost 10-year-old benchmark of the 1997-98 National Cataract Surgery Survey (NCSS) published in this journal. Extraneous to the peer-reviewed research literature, more recent databases suggest much better results may be being obtained. This offered the rare opportunity to perform an audit as research investigating if this was indeed the case and a new benchmark is needed, with the additional standard of rigorous study peer review by independent senior ophthalmologists. At this pilot centre for Patient Choice provision, all cataract surgery was performed on Consultant-supervised training lists, a novel extension in-sourcing care using public resources rather than to an independent sector that may not be supervised by NHS Consultants. Patient satisfaction was also surveyed. We asked whether the NCSS is out-of-date, and whether good outcomes on Choice schemes are compatible with Consultant-led training within the National Health Service?
METHODS: An audit of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery on Patient Choice at the Western Eye Hospital between October 2002 and September 2004. All subjects were scheduled for phacoemulsification. A novel policy was extending "choice" onto training list slots for this period. A validated questionnaire assessed patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: A best corrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better was obtained in 93% of cases. Over 80% of cases were +/-1 D of target refraction (65.7% within 0.5 D). The total incidence of complications was 8.7%. Overall incidence of major complications was 2.4%. Incidence of vitreous loss was 1.1% and that of endophthalmitis 0.1%. Complications rates were lowest for consultants (less than 1%). User satisfaction with having cataract surgery on "patient choice" was high.
CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery under patient choice on supervised training lists is associated with a visual outcome and an incidence of complications at least as good as the published national average. User satisfaction is high. Cataract surgery under patient choice is compatible with training activity in receiving hospitals. The improvement in outcomes since the 1997-98 NCSS suggest that the accepted standards for complication rates should be updated to reflect the fact that phacoemulsification has become an established procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050577      PMCID: PMC1955623          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.104216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  14 in total

1.  National cataract surgery survey 1997-8: a report of the results of the clinical outcomes.

Authors:  P Desai; D C Minassian; A Reidy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Public opinion on weekend and evening outpatient clinics.

Authors:  A J Churchill; C Gibbon; S Anand; M McKibbin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Building on the best--choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS.

Authors:  Zoë Lawrence
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  The new consent form: is it any better?

Authors:  Talal Ibrahim; Shong Meng Ong; Grahame John Saint Clair Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  A system for preoperative stratification of cataract patients according to risk of intraoperative complications: a prospective analysis of 1441 cases.

Authors:  M Muhtaseb; A Kalhoro; A Ionides
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Surgically induced diffuse scleritis following cataract surgery.

Authors:  J A Scott; L G Clearkin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 7.  Reflective consideration of postoperative endophthalmitis as a quality marker.

Authors:  S P Kelly; D Mathews; J Mathews; A Vail
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Cataract surgery in a community hospital outreach clinic: patients' costs and satisfaction.

Authors:  R Haynes; S Gale; M Mugford; P Davies
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Public views on healthcare performance indicators and patient choice.

Authors:  Helen Magee; Lucy-Jane Davis; Angela Coulter
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  [Result-related success rates of cataract operations. Results of a systematic literature review].

Authors:  U Hahn; F Krummenauer; I Neuhann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Do we need day-1 postoperative follow-up after cataract surgery?

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Piotr Kanclerz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Using data from the Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit to calculate risk of posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss for patients on current surgical lists.

Authors:  P K F Addison; R Rajendram; H Bradshaw; P G Hykin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Refractive and visual outcomes after combined cataract and trabectome surgery: a report on the possible influences of combining cataract and trabectome surgery on refractive and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Jan Luebke; D Boehringer; M Neuburger; A Anton; T Wecker; B Cakir; T Reinhard; J F Jordan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Benchmarks for outcome indicators in pediatric cataract surgery.

Authors:  B R Nihalani; D K VanderVeen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 6.  Cataract surgery and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

Authors:  Richard S Hoffman; Rosa Braga-Mele; Kendall Donaldson; Geoffrey Emerick; Bonnie Henderson; Malik Kahook; Nick Mamalis; Kevin M Miller; Tony Realini; Neal H Shorstein; Richard K Stiverson; Barbara Wirostko
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  The evaluation of the risk factors for capsular complications in phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Şule Berk Ergun; Sücattin İlker Kocamış; Hasan Basri Çakmak; Nurullah Çağıl
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Changing incidence of lens extraction over 20 years: the Beaver Dam eye study.

Authors:  Barbara E K Klein; Kerri P Howard; Kristine E Lee; Ronald Klein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  [Cataract surgery outcomes by temporal small incision techniques with and without phacoemulsification. Results of a prospective study from Kenya].

Authors:  S Briesen; H Roberts
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Validation of scoring system for preoperative stratification of intra-operative risks of complications during cataract surgery: Indian multi-centric study.

Authors:  Vinay Agrawal; Jinish Upadhyay
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.