Sarah L Goff1, Kathleen M Mazor2, Penelope S Pekow3, Katharine O White4, Aruna Priya3, Tara Lagu5, Haley Guhn-Knight5, Lorna Murphy6, Yara Youssef Budway7, Peter K Lindenauer5. 1. The Center for Quality of Care Research and Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts; sarah.goffmd@baystatehealth.org. 2. Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts. 3. The Center for Quality of Care Research, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center/Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. The Center for Quality of Care Research and Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts. 6. Renal Transplant Associates of New England, Springfield, Massachusetts; and. 7. Massachusetts General Hospital, Physician Analytics and Business Intelligence, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consumers rarely use publicly reported health care quality data. Despite known barriers to use, few studies have explored the effectiveness of strategies to overcome barriers in vulnerable populations. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial tested the impact of a patient navigator intervention to increase consumer use of publicly reported quality data. Patients attending an urban prenatal clinic serving a vulnerable population enrolled between May 2013 and January 2015. The intervention consisted of 2 in-person sessions in which women learned about quality performance and viewed scores for local practices on the Massachusetts Health Quality Partners Web site. Women in both the intervention and control arms received a pamphlet about health care quality. Primary study outcomes were mean clinical quality and patient experience scores of the practices women selected (range 1-4 stars). RESULTS:Nearly all (726/746; 97.3%) women completed the study, 59.7% were Hispanic, and 65.1% had a high school education or less. In both unadjusted and adjusted models, women in the intervention group chose practices with modestly higher mean clinical quality (3.2 vs 3.0 stars; P = .001) and patient experience (3.0 vs 2.9 stars; P = .05) scores. When asked to rate what factors mattered the most in their decision, few cited quality scores. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention to reduce barriers to using publicly reported health care quality data had a modest effect on patient choice. These findings suggest that factors other than performance on common publicly reported quality metrics have a stronger influence on which pediatric practices women choose.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Consumers rarely use publicly reported health care quality data. Despite known barriers to use, few studies have explored the effectiveness of strategies to overcome barriers in vulnerable populations. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial tested the impact of a patient navigator intervention to increase consumer use of publicly reported quality data. Patients attending an urban prenatal clinic serving a vulnerable population enrolled between May 2013 and January 2015. The intervention consisted of 2 in-person sessions in which women learned about quality performance and viewed scores for local practices on the Massachusetts Health Quality Partners Web site. Women in both the intervention and control arms received a pamphlet about health care quality. Primary study outcomes were mean clinical quality and patient experience scores of the practices women selected (range 1-4 stars). RESULTS: Nearly all (726/746; 97.3%) women completed the study, 59.7% were Hispanic, and 65.1% had a high school education or less. In both unadjusted and adjusted models, women in the intervention group chose practices with modestly higher mean clinical quality (3.2 vs 3.0 stars; P = .001) and patient experience (3.0 vs 2.9 stars; P = .05) scores. When asked to rate what factors mattered the most in their decision, few cited quality scores. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention to reduce barriers to using publicly reported health care quality data had a modest effect on patient choice. These findings suggest that factors other than performance on common publicly reported quality metrics have a stronger influence on which pediatric practices women choose.
Authors: Donna O Farley; Pamela Farley Short; Marc N Elliott; David E Kanouse; Julie A Brown; Ron D Hays Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Peter K Lindenauer; Denise Remus; Sheila Roman; Michael B Rothberg; Evan M Benjamin; Allen Ma; Dale W Bratzler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rita Mangione-Smith; Alison H DeCristofaro; Claude M Setodji; Joan Keesey; David J Klein; John L Adams; Mark A Schuster; Elizabeth A McGlynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael L Steinberg; Allen Fremont; David C Khan; David Huang; Herschel Knapp; Deborah Karaman; Nell Forge; Keith Andre; Lisa M Chaiken; Oscar E Streeter Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lauren D Harris-Kojetin; Jennifer D Uhrig; Peyton Williams; Carla Bann; Elizabeth M Frentzel; Lauren McCormack; Nancy Mitchell; Nathan West Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2007-03
Authors: Sarah L Goff; Penelope S Pekow; Katharine O White; Tara Lagu; Kathleen M Mazor; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: Trials Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Tara Lagu; Jacqueline Haskell; Emily Cooper; Daniel A Harris; Anne Murray; Rebekah L Gardner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: David M Hartley; Susannah Jonas; Daniel Grossoehme; Amy Kelly; Cassandra Dodds; Shannon M Alford; Elizabeth Shenkman; Jeff Simmons; L Charles Bailey; Hanieh Razzaghi; Levon H Utidjian; Jennifer McCafferty-Fernandez; F Sessions Cole; Jordan Smallwood; Lloyd N Werk; Kathleen E Walsh Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Sarah L Goff; Kathleen M Mazor; Haley Guhn-Knight; Yara Youssef Budway; Lorna Murphy; Katharine O White; Tara Lagu; Penelope S Pekow; Aruna Priya; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2017-03-08
Authors: Sarah L Goff; Jane L Garb; Haley Guhn-Knight; Aruna Priya; Penelope S Pekow; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 1.954