Literature DB >> 18695180

Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty.

Barbara Conner-Spady1, Claudia Sanmartin, Geoffrey Johnston, John McGurran, Melissa Kehler, Tom Noseworthy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To improve access to care, many jurisdictions have proposed waiting-time benchmarks and guarantees. We assessed the willingness of patients to consider changing their surgeon to one with a shorter waiting time for arthroplasty.
METHODS: We mailed a questionnaire to 2 random samples of patients who either were awaiting hip or knee replacement arthroplasty or had had one of these procedures within the preceding 3-12 months. We used logistic regression to assess the determinants of patients' likelihood to consider changing surgeons.
RESULTS: Of 1200 responses from a sample of 2000, 557 (46%) were from patients awaiting surgery and 643 (54%) were from people who had undergone surgery. The mean age of respondents was 69.9 years (standard deviation 10.8), and 682 (57%) were women. The median waiting time for surgery was 8 months. Overall, 753 (63%) of the patients were unlikely to consider changing surgeons. Increased likelihood of changing surgeons was associated with male sex (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.02), a high school education or higher (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.15-2.62) and having already undergone surgery (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.19-2.46). Decreased likelihood was associated with preference for a particular surgeon before referral (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.79), a better score on the EuroQol (EQ-5D) index (a measure of health-related quality of life) (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.66), perception that the waiting time to see the surgeon was acceptable (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.36-0.70), perception that the waiting time to surgery was acceptable (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.91) and perceived fairness of treatment (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36-0.78).
INTERPRETATION: Despite long waits for surgery, most patients, if given the choice, would be unlikely to change their surgeon to one with a shorter waiting time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18695180      PMCID: PMC2492973          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  24 in total

1.  The impact of market oriented reforms on choice and information: a case study of cataract surgery in outer London and Stockholm.

Authors:  M Fotaki
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  M N Marshall; P G Shekelle; S Leatherman; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Maximum waiting time - a threat to clinical freedom? Implementation of a policy to reduce waiting times.

Authors:  M Hanning; U W Spångberg
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Tackling excessive waiting times for elective surgery: a comparative analysis of policies in 12 OECD countries.

Authors:  Luigi Siciliani; Jeremy Hurst
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Do patients always prefer quicker treatment? : a discrete choice analysis of patients' stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project.

Authors:  Peter Burge; Nancy Devlin; John Appleby; Charlene Rohr; Jonathan Grant
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.561

6.  Is patient choice an effective mechanism to reduce waiting times?

Authors:  Diane Dawson; Rowena Jacobs; Steve Martin; Peter Smith
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.561

7.  Joint recovery programme versus usual care: an economic evaluation of a clinical pathway for joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  Daniëlle E Brunenberg; Mike J van Steyn; Judith C Sluimer; Linda L Bekebrede; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Manuela A Joore
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Crispin Jenkinson
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Should I stay or should I go? Waiting lists and cross-border care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Werner Brouwer; Job van Exel; Bert Hermans; Arjen Stoop
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  A bird can't fly on one wing: patient views on waiting for hip and knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Geoffrey H Johnston; Claudia Sanmartin; John J McGurran; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  10 in total

1.  Patient attitudes toward pooled surgical waitlists in urogynecology.

Authors:  Rebekah A Zee; Aisling A Clancy; Hisham Khalil
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Which factors decided general practitioners' choice of hospital on behalf of their patients in an area with free choice of public hospital? A questionnaire study.

Authors:  Hans O Birk; Lars O Henriksen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  The effects of publishing emergency department wait time on patient utilization patterns in a community with two emergency department sites: a retrospective, quasi-experiment design.

Authors:  Bin Xie; Sabrina Youash
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-14

4.  Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states: preliminary value set and considerations for future valuation studies.

Authors:  Nick Bansback; Aki Tsuchiya; John Brazier; Aslam Anis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Waiting for surgery from the patient perspective.

Authors:  Tracey Carr; Ulrich Teucher; Jackie Mann; Alan G Casson
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2009-10-14

6.  Patients' experience of choosing an outpatient clinic in one county in Denmark: results of a patient survey.

Authors:  Hans O Birk; Rikke Gut; Lars O Henriksen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  What is the influence of single-entry models on access to elective surgical procedures? A systematic review.

Authors:  Zaheed Damani; Barbara Conner-Spady; Tina Nash; Henry Tom Stelfox; Tom W Noseworthy; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation.

Authors:  Zaheed Damani; Eric Bohm; Hude Quan; Thomas Noseworthy; Gail MacKean; Lynda Loucks; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A single-entry model and wait time for hip and knee replacement in eastern health region of Newfoundland and Labrador 2011-2019.

Authors:  Anh Thu Vo; Yanqing Yi; Maria Mathews; James Valcour; Michelle Alexander; Marcel Billard
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Rubén E Mújica Mota; Rosanna Tarricone; Oriana Ciani; John F P Bridges; Mike Drummond
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.