Literature DB >> 12832974

Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure.

Bernd Gerber1, Annette Krause, Toralf Reimer, Heiner Müller, Ingrid Küchenmeister, Joseph Makovitzky, Günther Kundt, Klaus Friese.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Is skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with conservation of the Nipple-Areola Complex (NAC) and immediate autologous reconstruction as safe in oncologic terms as SSM with resection of the NAC as modified radical mastectomy (MRM)? SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The originally described technique of SSM included the removal of gland, NAC, and biopsy scar. However, the risk of tumor involvement of NAC in patients with breast cancer has been overestimated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2000, 286 selected patients with an indication for MRM and tumor margins of greater than 2 cm from the nipple were presented with the alternative of a SSM. Regular follow-up data were evaluable of 112 patients with SSM and 134 patients with MRM. Immediate reconstruction was achieved by latissimus dorsi flap or TRAM flap. The mean follow-up time was 59 (18 to 92) months.
RESULTS: Patients with SSM were significantly younger than those with MRM but were comparable regarding clinical data, tumor parameters, adjuvant treatment, and overall complications. After intraoperative frozen sections of the NAC-ground, the NAC could be conserved in 61 (54.5%) but was resected in 51 (45.5%) of the 112 patients with SSM. The aesthetic results after SSM were evaluated as excellent or good in 91.1% (102/112) patients and were significantly better after preservation of the NAC (P = 0.001). Six (5.4%) recurrences occurred in 112 patients with SSM compared with 11 (8.2%) cases after MRM. Only 1 recurrence in a conserved nipple was treated by wide excision of nipple with conservation of the areola. This patient is still free of disease after 52 months.
CONCLUSION: In patients who are candidates for a mastectomy and tumors distant from the nipple, SSM with intraoperative frozen section of the NAC ground offers the opportunity of NAC conservation without increasing the risk of local recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12832974      PMCID: PMC1422651          DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000077922.38307.cd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  38 in total

1.  A comparative study of subcutaneous mastectomy with radical mastectomy.

Authors:  J Horiguchi; H Takei; Y Koibuchi; K Iijima; F Ikeda; R Ochiai; K Uchida; M Yoshida; T Yokoe; Y Morishita
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  When can the nipple-areola complex safely be spared during mastectomy?

Authors:  J Arthur Jensen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  D Santini; M Taffurelli; M C Gelli; A Grassigli; F Giosa; D Marrano; G Martinelli
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved?

Authors:  Rache M Simmons; Meghan Brennan; Paul Christos; Valencia King; Michael Osborne
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Heriberto Medina-Franco; Luis O Vasconez; R Jobe Fix; Martin J Heslin; Samuel W Beenken; Kirby I Bland; Marshall M Urist
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi flap after skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  J I de la Torre; R J Fix; P M Gardner; L O Vasconez
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  The peri-areolar incision--gateway to the breast!

Authors:  S Shrotria
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Incidence of the superficial fascia and its relevance in skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Gertrude M Beer; Zsuzsanna Varga; Srecko Budi; Burkhardt Seifert; Viktor E Meyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning.

Authors:  B A Toth; P Lappert
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study for the treatment of advanced stages of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert D Foster; Laura J Esserman; James P Anthony; Eun-sil S Hwang; Hoang Do
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  50 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of video-assisted skin-sparing partial mastectomy for breast cancer and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle flap as breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Hiroo Nakajima; Ikuya Fujiwara; Naruhiko Mizuta; Koichi Sakaguchi; Mahiro Ohashi; Asako Nishiyama; Yoshimi Umeda; Miho Ichida; Junji Magae
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  The use of postoperative radiation after nipple sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

4.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy - Extended Indications and Limitations.

Authors:  Markus Niemeyera; Johannes Ettla; Birgit Plattnera; Rainer Schmida; Daniel Müllerb; Hans-Günther Machensb; Marion Kiechlea; Stefan Paepkea
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Intraoperative radiotherapy in early stage breast cancer: potential indications and evidence to date.

Authors:  G G Hanna; A M Kirby
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Rajiv P Parikh; Grace Um; Simone W Kantola; Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution.

Authors:  Teruhisa Sakurai; Ning Zhang; Takaomi Suzuma; Teiji Umemura; Goro Yoshimura; Takeo Sakurai; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Outcome of management of local recurrence after immediate transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Taik Jong Lee; Wu Jin Hur; Eun Key Kim; Sei Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-13

9.  Nipple Areola Complex Involvement in Invasive Carcinoma Breast.

Authors:  Paul Augustine; Soundrarajan Alagu Ramesh; Ramachandran Krishnankutty Nair; Renu Sukumaran; Regi Jose; Kurian Cherian; Madhu Muralee; Iqbal Ahamad
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-08

10.  Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Sara Reefy; Neill Patani; Anne Anderson; Gwyne Burgoyne; Hisham Osman; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.